patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

District 219 Had $127 Million Wad of Discretionary Cash

Patch scours heavy 2009-2010 fiscal report to see where the money went in the 4,800-student school system.

 

On Monday night, the board of education accepted a 149-page financial report on the spending that occurred during the 2009-2010 academic year at Niles Township High School District 219.

In the nearly 150 pages of numbers, charts and graphs (which accompany this article), there is plenty to dissect about the way money dictates and reflects the school district.

More than 4,800 students from Lincolnwood, Skokie as well as parts of Morton Grove and Niles attend either Niles North or Niles West high schools. They make District 219 one of the largest school systems in the North Shore.

Write it in chalk or put it in ink: Money makes the school go round for the students and faculty. Here’s a breakdown of some of the information from the report.

Funding brackets

School funds are broken up into two camps: governmental funds and fiduciary funds.

The first refers to the money used for “essentially the same function as reported in governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements,” and is organized into eight brackets:

  • Educational fund
  • Operations and maintenance fund
  • Tort immunity and judgment fund
  • Transportation fund
  • Municipal retirement and Social Security fund
  • Working cash fund
  • Debt service fund
  • Fire prevention and safety fund

The second camp, fiduciary funds, are maintained for the “benefit of parties outside the district” and therefore are kept separate because the money cannot be used in district programs.

Spending habits

Last year, more than half of District 219’s spending went to the educational fund, which tallied up more than $90 million in total expenditures, a 9.4 percent increase from the previous year.

“Teachers are the biggest driver of our decision-making,” Paul O’Malley, the assistant superintendent for business services at District 219, said in an interview with Morton Grove Patch on Tuesday.

“Of all the money we spent, 58 percent of it went to the educational fund, which pays for teachers and support staff salaries,” he added.

Within the educational fund, $53.7 million was spent on "instruction" or salaries in the 2010 fiscal year, compared with $51.2 million in 2009. "Support services" accounted for $24.1 million in 2010 versus $22.8 million in 2009. 

"I think the entire system is very unclear as to how the system divvies out the money spent in classroom versus everything else," said Bruno Behrend, the director for the Center for School Reform at The Heartland Institute.

"Clearly they’re adding support services under [the] educational fund, and that's one area where they hide an awful lot of administrative expenses," he added.

The next highest expenditure came in the operations and maintenance fund. The more than $13 million spent represented a 2.6 percent increase from the previous year.

The working cash fund--at 18 percent of the total government fund balance--is the most liquid financial resource and is used for loans to other school funds to maintain cash-flow requirements, according to O’Malley.

Cash on hand

For the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2010, District 219 had more than $127 million in its total undesignated fund balance, which is discretionary money “available for spending,” according to its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The balance is about $20 million more than in the 2008-2009 financial year.

“The money we have in reserves allows us to be stable when a late distribution of taxes is collected,” said O’Malley. “It is what we are able to do to maintain the cash flow, which is how we pay pretty much everyone.”

Jim Szczepaniak, the communications director for the district, explained that state law dictates the way cash moves among different funds.

“A member of the public may ask why are we building a new swimming pool at the same time as considering teacher cuts. The answer is, we are limited by law; we cannot use money from the capital fund to pay for the education fund,” he said.

Szczepaniak also mentioned District 219’s “Recognition” designation by the Illinois State Board of Education, which assessed the school system’s financial health at the highest category possible, as it has since the fiscal 2005.

For the financial profile score, the district earned a score of 3.9 out of 4.0 for fiscal 2010. Of 868 profiled, 604 school districts received the “Recognition” label.

“It’s very easy for a well-funded and property-rich school district to point to those designations as proof they are doing a good job,” said Behrend of the Center for School Reform.

“I would question that designation, not necessarily to say it’s not true, but because it really doesn’t tell us very much,” he added

Behrend pushed the point further:

“The district spends [at least] $110 million last year and has $127 million a year in savings. This represents massive overtaxation and quite frankly, warrants a large tax abatement for every district property taxpayer.”

According to the financial report approved on Monday, property taxes account for nearly 80 percent of district's revenue, or almost $120 million out of nearly $151 million in total revenue. 

In the spring of 2004, voters in District 219 passed a referendum to bump up the educational property tax rate from 1.2991 to 1.5291, or by 23 cents, according to the report. There have not been any additional referendums since then.

Nearby, New Trier Township High School District 203 has also released its comprehensive financial report, noting that it is "extremely dependent upon tax revenues, which account for 82.0 percent of total revenues." For the fiscal year that also ended June 30, 2010, revenue for the total government funds rang up at $111 million, with $89.7 million derived in property taxes.

"Clearly one of the most challenging things is being able to answer things in a simple fashion because it is a very complex system that we have," District 219's Szczepaniak said of the combination of factors, such as property tax funds, statutory law and historical information, which influences spending. 

Check back on Friday to find out what District 219 spends on pizza, taxis and students. To read Part 1 of our series, click here.

About this column: An exclusive investigative series looking at District 219's vendor payments over the last five years.

Earl Weiss

6:49 am on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Maybe they will do the smart thing and pay down some debt, saving some interest expense. Maybe they will do the right thing and roll back exorbitant student fees.
yep, sure, right after the easter bunny lays egss on the lawn and Santa comes down the Chimney.

Reply

Ruth H

9:15 am on Thursday, April 14, 2011

We should give District 219 some credit; they have one of the best school systems in the country!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Georgia

1:19 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

really? where did you read that?

Matt

11:12 am on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Having good teachers and students is no excuse for acting like complete imbeciles at the administrative level. Just think of how great a school it would be if they actually had good leaders.

Reply

Clark Kent

5:08 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

I hope the guy in the article below doesn't learn about the cash bonanza in 219. Imagine future 219 staffers demanding housing in their contracts, too! The discretionary money would be gone in a New York minute. Maybe before that happens Silverstein and his indefatigable penny-pinching board members could buy available mansions currently for sale. Gee, why not pre-owned BMWs for administrative transportation? Administrators could be provided with housing which helps relax them after a hard day at the grind wheel, and in vehicular quietude they could wheel their way home where they spend even more hours solving the dilemmas of NTHS. That would take a lot of thought and planning...better hire consultants first!

Big wheels getting big salaries from big Silverstein budgets with big dollars squeezed from big tax bills.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/highschool/blog/prep_rally/post/Florida-school-to-pay-hoops-head-man-more-than-4?urn=highschool-wp985

Reply
Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

6:00 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

>>>>Clark Kent-
Maybe before that happens Silverstein and his indefatigable penny-pinching board members could buy available mansions currently for sale.

Big wheels getting big salaries from big Silverstein budgets <<<

I give up. who is "Silverstein". Do you mean the Board President?
If that is who you referred to as "penny pinching" , you have an interesting sense of humor.

Comment_arrow

Clark Kent

10:55 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Oops! Silverstein = Silverman.

Gertrude I think once opined: "A Silverman by any other name is still a Silverman."

"Hi-yo, Silver! Away!"

Nasir

11:54 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

I find Behrand's comments/arguments confusing. He appears to be suggesting that the administration is being wasteful and hiding administrative expenses. He then later criticizes the district for overtaxing and spending less than the amount collected from taxes. If I understand correctly, he seems to be suggesting that the district should tax less and spend less and still be able to improve education--this sounds perfect, but is it practical? Many school districts across the country are underfunded which leads to insufficient faculty, facilities and equipment and a major cause of poor student performance. District 219, according to many metrics in financially sound and provides good education. I wonder if Behrand is chasing some ideal that cannot be met.

Reply

Quane

2:30 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

BQ

Strong fund balances is an example of good fiscal management. Preventing the ability of school districts to keep and maintain fund balances will create financial chaos. School districts that are forced to rebate a significant portion of their fund balances back to the tax payer on Monday will be cutting programs and teachers on a Wednesday and asking taxpayers again for a tax rate referendum on a Friday. Hell of a week. Because increased labor benefit costs (due to generous administrative and teacher salary increases and threat of teacher strikes) are not affordable or sustainable, districts live with structural deficits that must be managed for as long as possible. Without healthy fund balances, District 219 would already be preparing for a referendum-the last referendum was in 2004. Thankfully, this may not happen for several more years.

Reply

Leave a comment