patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Lincolnwood 'Quietly' OKs Firing Range, Gun Shop

Only one person attended Lincolnwood's Planning Commission meeting last week. Officials changed zoning laws so a 30,000-square-foot gun shop and 16-lane-firing range could be closer to schools, parks and a planned bike path.

 
0 of 0
Lincolnwood zoning officials changed the requirement to build a gun shop, firing range, from half-a-mile to just 800 feet. They also allowed the potential business to have zero parking spaces, as oppose to the 74 per Lincolnwood code.
Photos (1)

Photos

Pdfs (1)

Pdfs

Lincolnwood zoning officials changed the requirement to build a gun shop, firing range, from half-a-mile to just 800 feet. They also allowed the potential business to have zero parking spaces, as oppose to the 74 per Lincolnwood code.

A 16-lane firing range could be coming to Lincolnwood within a few blocks of several District 74 schools.

The village's Planning Commission recently cleared the way for the 30,000 square foot gun shop and 16-lane firing range. In the past, the village has not allowed such businesses to locate within half-a-mile of any school, park or residence. (See map above by clicking the PDF image)

If built, the gun shop would be in close proximity to three parks; Drake Park, Columbia Park and O'Brien Park. One Lincolnwood business owner has already started a petition to stop the gun shop from coming to town.

"They're quietly doing some major zoning changes to let these guys in," said Lincolnwood business owner Mike Shapiro. "[The new laws] were passed at a planning commission meeting and I was the only one there."

Read more: Alleged Skokie Shooter Attended ‘Machine Gun Fest’

The proposed site for the new gun shop would be next door to Shapiro's business, Ravens Wood Studio, in the 6900 block of N. Central Park. Besides the gun shop being within 800 feet of several schools (Rutledge Hall, Todd Hall and Lincoln Hall), Shapiro is concerned about the parking and proximity to Lincolnwood's bike path. In the latter, the bike route runs directly adjacent to the proposed site.

A business the size of the proposed gun shop needs to have at least 74 parking spaces according to Lincolnwood village code, but the planning commission made another exception and changed the requirement to zero. That means parking used by existing business owners such as Shapiro will have to satisfy the parking needs of the gun shop.

"The village is just allowing them an awful lot for this one business to come in," Shapiro said. "The parking will hurt the other businesses. The noise potential could drive me out ... The Village Board instructed the plan commission to make this work. If nobody speaks up I think this will get passed."

The Village Board is set to vote on the measure on July 17. The next Village Board meeting is this Tuesday, June 19 at 7:30 p.m.

Like Skokie Patch on Facebook

Related Topics: Firing Range, Lincolnwood, Skokie, and gun shop

Frank

10:00 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

I hope this scares all readers as much as it scares me.....Lincolnwood, WAKE UP!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elena

8:52 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I agree with you. Lincolnwood residents have been on a very deep sleep. District 74 is a good example. It took the citizens finally getting fed-up. I agree that I did not attend the meeting in question. I have been concentrating on getting to know what is actually going on at all levels. I have been the only resident to ever attend a board meeting of the Fire & Police Commission. (Fire Dept?? - other than one secretary, the fire department staff are not employed by the Village). There are 2 openings at the police with 15 finalists, 5 women. When I asked about their meeting, no one seemed to know when the meeting was going to be held or at what time. I urged the Commission to increase the number of female officers particularly having female officers investigate cases involving domestic violence and sexual abuse cases. I went to the meeting today at 5:00 p.m. Other than one member who seemed pleased to see me, the rest were not happy at all to see me. The chairperson, a woman, told me that I had 3 minutes to say whatever and that they were not going to answer any questions as I could see read everything on the website. They basically threw me out of there. .

Are you aware that there are two pedophiles living in Lincolnwood? Who are they? I was told by one of the investigators.

Are you aware that info is posted in the Village? When I asked, I was told that they could mail me info. Why should we be fishing for info while paying taxes?

Z

10:13 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

I'm looking forward to a local gun range and shop. It's not like it's an outdoor range with bullets flying.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elena

8:56 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Will you complain when it is next to your home with bullets flying as you mention?

Skokie Mike

10:35 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

@ z -

Hey man i like your thinking! Lets also bring in a strip club and casino, because hey, they're inside right!

This is a terrible idea and the way Lincolnwood is going about it smells so bad ....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elena

8:57 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Skokie Mike, I agree with you. Let's think on how we can make money and forget about the residents or the quality of life for the residents.

Z

1:36 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Let's try it this way... What is the purpose of anyone making the argument that it's a bad idea to put a gun range blocks away from a school? Inherently people assume, "OMG bullets are flying near our kids." The point is that the gun range will be indoors, so its location, being mere blocks from a school, is irrelevant. (If the argument is about the dangers of a gun range.)

If the argument is about the patronage of a gun shop, that's another failure. The type of people you and I (and I assume you would agree) don't want having guns, are not coming to a Lincolnwood retail store to purchase them. They can't afford them and don't want them with purchasing guidelines from the Federal Government, serial numbers, and so forth. They'll still be buying them out of a trunk elsewhere.

So again, what's the problem with a gun shop and gun range? It's not a strip club with alcohol and debauchery. It's not a casino where people are gambling away their pay-checks and consuming cheap liquor. So where's the comparison and problem?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Skokie Mike

1:40 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

@ Z

Yea, everyone with a gun that is bad bought it out of a trunk. Great stat. Here is the real problem with this. Of all the people with guns, a small percentage are irresponsible idiots. Now, the area will increase with these types of people because they will be coming to the firing range. And some of them will be idiots. Like this guy:http://skokie.patch.com/articles/alleged-skokie-shooter-attended-machine-gun-fest#photo-10345490

If something WERE to happen, I sure as hell don't want it RIGHT NEXT TO A BIKE PATH, near a school or parks.

I don't have a problem with the store, but build it somewhere else. And what gives with LW being so hush hush about this? Don't you think they should have notified parents at the schools about this? Hmmm I wonder why they didnt.

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

9:32 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Z,
Please see my comment on relvancy of the design of the range. if state of theart contains a concrete ceiling, and this one does not, it is not then, state of the art as Mitch and his partners claim. Also, I have been shooting many times and have enjoyed it. Still, this was a range with a concrete ceiling and in the sticks, nearest school was way far away, miles...(rural Missouri)

Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

10:01 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

"kevin snow
,
Please see my comment on relvancy of the design of the range. if state of theart contains a concrete ceiling, ."

Interesting. I would like to be educated on what is "State of the Art" for such a facility. I can see why Concrete ceilings might be a good thing, and can also see why they might not be. There may be alternatives that are as good or better.

So, where does one find this info?

Comment_arrow

Elena

9:23 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Unreal to read your comment Z. How about if you take a few minutes to read the Supreme Court decision with Justice Sotomayor's statement. Read Bongani Calhoun. It is amazing that anyone would make such a comment on 2013. Let's see, the CT school massacre was committed by a caucasian male from a very wealthy income. He had the $. What about the one at the theater in CO? He certainly could afford to buy an arsenal. Thus, so long as it is not a strip club with alcohol and debauchery, or a casino with cheap liquor and I guess people who can't afford to live in Lincolnwood, it would be okay with you? Wow!

Earl Weiss

2:20 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

I wonder how many people know that Lincolnwood already has a gun shop. Been there for decades. Lots of problems right?

I wonder how many people know Linconwood had a gun range for decades. Again, lots of probelms right?

Reply
Comment_arrow

kevin snow

1:29 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

hey Earl, where is this other gun range in Lwood?

Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

1:58 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

Gabby Hartnett's was downstairs of the Bowling Alley on Lincoln East of Craford a ways. It's been closed now for maybe 20 years. (maybe more) Went there in the 1970's and 1980's. Not sure when it opened.

Lincolnwood 2000

11:43 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Lincolnwood zoning essentially bans gun shops. Shore was grandfathered in about 15 years ago with the understanding that they wouldn't move anywhere else. We voted on it back then. The two things that have changed are

1) the land purchase for the bike path - this deal seems to be rushed because it would fail even the less restrictive revised ordinance with the new bike.

2) the administration process that essential slipped it through.with little the legal minimum public notice. Other activities are highly publicized in newsletters, press releases etc. Only one interested party attended the hearing. In comparison many people attended the hearing regarding the bike path on the week before.

This comes down to a question of transparency. Lincolnwood citizen rose up and objected to the lack of transparency in the school district. They will do the same here. This issue could make the 2013 election high contentiousness and could result in a transition away from the alliance that has led the village for a generation.

Reply

Shawn Fynn

9:25 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Its my understanding that Shore Galleries brings in more sales tax revenue than all of the auto dealerships combined as they were always threatening to leave the village without tax breaks. Shore Galleries clientle is nearly exclusively local, state and Federal Law Enforcement officers.

If Shore is finally expanding with a range, they have my support 110% if you have a problem with bringing in more tax revenue to the village with a company that actively supports First Responders, then I'm curious why you're not privately working on the economic development group to bring more warm and fuzzy businesses to Lincolnwood?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judith Snyder

9:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

But we are members of various committees and village staff and officials did not disclose information to the appropriately concerned parties

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

12:06 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Shawn: See my note on projections from the city of Lincolnwood on taxes: $3000 to 15,000. NOT 70k. 70k would mean Shore would have to be 14 million dollar net income business. Not likely. current amusement tax rate is between 1 and 5% at the discretion of the city.

Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

2:33 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

"kevin snow
. 70k would mean Shore would have to be 14 million dollar net income

Either you or I need a new calculator. 5% 0f 1.4 Million - $1,400,000 (not 14 Million) is $70,000.

Earl Weiss

9:25 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

"
Reply

Lincolnwood 2000

11:43 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Lincolnwood zoning essentially bans gun shops. Shore was grandfathered in about 15 years ago with the understanding that they wouldn't move anywhere else. We voted on it back then. "

Perhaps exactly the reason the ordinance was changed. Chicago changed theres as well due to some rulings indicating the disguised ban was illegal and instead of having it struck down and being left with nothing hoped to come up with something more reasoneable.

Reply

Lincolnwood 2000

2:01 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

The tax statement is a complete fallacy. The auto dealership bring in the largest. The mall second. Lowe's third. I have no idea who is fourth.

Earl - Regarding policy - Except for the grandfathering it is essentially the same as Skokie

Reply
Comment_arrow

kevin snow

12:04 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

See my note on projections from the city of Lincolnwood on taxes: $3000 to 15,000.

Z

9:54 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Who's in for purchasing a nice H & K 9 mm? Group buy?

Reply

Lincolnwood 2000

10:07 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Who is for voting out elected representatives who hide their actions?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elena

9:36 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I agree to some degree. If you look at the candidates running trying to replace Mayor Turry, they go from one post to another. Moy is running again for Mayor and if he wins, we will see his picture everywhere again. Nice, what about services? Turry is very sensitive to the needs of Lincolnwood. The only way to bring change is to get involved and begin to question who is appointed to the various boards/ commissions and who is recommending them and what is going on at each of the boards and at each of the departments. Just try asking questions. My experience is that Lincolnwood staff is used to saying whatever and residents take it quietly. Are you then surprised with what is happening?

Lincolnwood 2000

11:23 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

We took back the school board and administration. It can happen again. The community is mobilized. Look what we did with the bInd referendum. We switched the majority of the board. We got every administrator out.

Reply

r neville

7:32 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

Why would you wish to ban people from having somewhere to practice and improve their knowledge and skills?

Isn't that what responsible gun owners are supposed to do?

Doesn't that make them better neighbors?

Reply

S .W.

7:32 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

I support having a gun shop with a range in lincolnwood . I miss Gabby Hartnets , which had a bowling alley above and a gunrange in the basement below it .No problems occurred there and then , Most automobile drivers arent " idiots" most gun owners or shooting sports enthusiasts arent Idiots either . Why is it that everything a redblooded american enjoyed doing in the 50's 60's and 70's seems to be under attack ?

Reply

Rhonda

9:33 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

A lot of the same shrill voices here were also horrified that a liquor store was opening across the street from a park-the children will be killed running to buy a soda! That was actually brought up at a village meeting. Indoor gun range is a great idea-there is a lot of empty space in the industrial areas of L'wood & Skokie. I drove by Gabby Hartnett's many times when it had a gun range and never noticed any stray bullets flying by. I'm more likely to get run over by a soccer mom flying through a stop sign or red light than I am hit by a stray bullet from an indoor shooting range. Instead of trying to baby proof the entire world why don't you concerned parents start at home and teach your dull witted kids some common sense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

rzdw92

10:32 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

"your dull witted kids"

nice example of shrill

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

11:50 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Rhonda, please see my comments about the proposed construction of this range and concerns about stray bullets.

rzdw92

10:32 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

you gun supporters presume the rest of us want to have (or attract) guns in our neighborhoods. we don't.

I suppose it's the same as anti-abortionists who don't want to have an abortion clinic in their backyard.

tolerating a gun shop or a gun range means I tolerate guns in general. I don't. sorry, you can argue all you want but you can't change my mind on that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

11:03 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

Some important points
" rzdw92

you gun supporters presume the rest of us want to have (or attract) guns in our neighborhoods. we don't."

I haven't seen anyone make any such claim or presumption.

"I suppose it's the same as anti-abortionists who don't want to have an abortion clinic in their backyard.

tolerating a gun shop or a gun range means I tolerate guns in general. I don't. sorry, you can argue all you want but you can't change my mind on that."

I haven't seen anyone try to change anyones mind. I have seen people expalin their positions, and therein lies an important point.

There are many things that the government has deemed lawful. No one would believe that everyone would support let alone accept all those things as being right for them or something they or their family should aspire to.

However, in a lawful society we must tolerate even those things we don't accept or aspire to and work through proper channels to effect changes we desire.

Lincolnwood 2000

10:32 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

I never made a statement for or against the gun range. My concern is transparency in government. When elected officials try to slip things by residents we lose trust in them.

Regarding concerns and ultimate approval of Lincolnwood Wine and Spirits. The Village was very open about the liquor store. Announcements of hearings were disseminated. Operating hours, shelve space, etc, were discussed and vetted.to the community. The business was required to meet code.

In gun shop case, a sign was placed in front of the business. There were no press releases or outreach regarding hearings. Significant variations in code were decided without public vetting.

Mayor Grant fostered in an era of transparent government. It is slipping away in Village government. We lost transparency with SD74 - It was a multi-year process. This year we took SD74..

If the community feels that the gun shop approval is the right action then so be it. Slipping it under the radar and later having to say it is too late to go back is not how to run government.

This is the type of issue that gets elected officials voted out of office.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judith Snyder

9:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Exactly. Concerned citizens never had an opportunity to voice concerns and opinions. Watch the Planning Commission meeting video available on the village website - see for yourself.

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

11:57 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Please note that in the meeting that the issue of collecting 70k in amusment taxes has not yet been decided, and will not be until after this has been approved. Ask yourself, if the mayor has allowed Mitch to not have:
--Any parking at all. (note: in the same building, the previous owner was required by the city to install parking on their property at great expense, as the only way they could do it was to elevate the expansion for parking underneath. This was for a business with 20 employees.
--To change the laws to allow the saftey area reduced to 800' from 1/2 mile.
If they let this go, what makes you think that the tax wont be forgiven as well??

rzdw92

1:04 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

"Earl Weiss"
<I haven't seen anyone make any such claim or presumption.>

To argue that life is ok with gun shops or gun ranges implies that life is ok with guns in general. I disagree with that implicit assumption.

<I haven't seen anyone try to change anyones mind.>
I suppose that you are inadvertently correct -- the entire nature of comment discussions on the internet can be largely boiled down to: "I am right, you are wrong, and oh btw, you are an idiot".

Reply
Comment_arrow

JC

3:25 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

rz,

If you follow Earl's prolific trolling of the Patch, you will find that most of his arguments boil down to your quote. I tend to disregard the opinion of anyone who cannot differentiate between "there" and "their." Those who speak the most, and those who speak loudest, are often the ones saying the least.

Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

4:36 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

"rzdw92

1:04 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012
<I haven't seen anyone try to change anyones mind.>
I suppose that you are inadvertently correct -- the entire nature of comment discussions on the internet can be largely boiled down to: "I am right, you are wrong, and oh btw, you are an idiot".

If you think this is how I came across responding to your post you have my sincere apologies. The internet is an imperfect means of communication. I would be curious to know exactly which of my posts gave you that impression.

Earl Weiss

4:36 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

"JC

rz,

If you follow Earl's prolific trolling of the Patch, you will find that most of his arguments boil down to your quote. I tend to disregard the opinion of anyone who cannot differentiate between "there" and "their." Those who speak the most, and those who speak loudest, are often the ones saying the least.
""

JC -
Unlike you I don't disregard opinions. I accept that opinions vary. When the only support for an opinion is an ad hominem attack, (not directed to rz, apparently I have done something to offend JC, so he sees fit to engage in such rhetoric) then I give it less weight.

Reply

Judith Snyder

9:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The residents and citizens of Lincolnwood need to be made aware of a proposal currently being considered by our village leaders to permit the establishment of a new, 16 lane gun and rifle range accompanied by a large retail and multiuse gun shop facility. The municipal, zoning and parking codes all must be changed in order to permit this. On June 6, the Planning Commission voted to approve this proposal by a vote of 5:1 with 1 absence. Concerned citizens may sign a petition against this proposal which is available at: http://chn.ge/no-guns
The new gun “megaplex” is to be 6950 Central Park, 4 blocks east of our School District 74 campus, just over 800 feet from Drake Park and directly adjacent to the new bike path along the old Union Pacific Railway property. Concerns about noise and lead pollution, resident safety, traffic and parking, impact on parks, location near the new bike path and the grants that fund these improvements, have not been addressed by village leadership. For example, the Plan Commission chose to overlook a discrepancy of almost 50 parking spots in approving this proposal. A staff recommendation of 70 spots for a site which currently has NO spots up to village standards was disregarded for a plan which allows for only 22 parking places.
A lack of transparency and clarity from our village leadership has clouded this very serious and difficult issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shawn Fynn

8:56 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

I'll bet Judith (or most of the negative posters here) have never visited Shore Galleries in their life, she's likely basing her misdirected negative thoughts on the gang gun violence in Chicago where the criminals don't submit their information to the Illinois State Police for a background check, pay a fee, and get a Illinois FOID card before being able to look at buying a gun.

Judith seems oblivious that in order to get grants for bike paths and Olympic sized swimming pools, you need tax dollars to pay for those amenities. At a time when no one is creating new businesses in Lincolnwood or Illinois, when the Purple Hotel site slowly rots away with rampant mold, and there are no new developments planned for Lincolnwood, Where else are you going to get tax dollars to pay for new parks, or bike trails?

Judith and the other citizens of Lincolnwood have their panties in a knot because they don't like nor understand guns, and law-abiding gun owners.

I have to wonder if they'd welcome with open arms a LGBT nightclub at the old Gabby Hartnett's lot (as long as there was enough parking), or would I get something in the mail announcing DID YOU KNOW there is 30,000 sq.ft GAY nightclub opening down the road from Lincoln Hall?

Probably the same reaction...

Comment_arrow

Lincolnwood 2000

7:48 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Shawn Fynn - You don't need to be condescending, personal, and a misogynist.

First, the bike path will largely be paid for by state and federal grants, not local sales taxes. Incremental sales taxes will have little impact.

Second, as I stated before the largest provider of sales taxes in Lincolnwood are 1) automobile sales 2) Lincolnwood Town Center 3) Lowe's. Automobile taxes are the lion's share. I don't even know if Shore is in the top 5 or 10.

Third, if you read the news, the Purple Hotel site was sold to a developer (Weiss). The developer has a strong track record of successfully completing projects in our area (e.g.WiFi building on McCormick). We will have a hotel (with a hotel tax) as well as retail there in 2013-2014. Plans are under review at the Village.

Fourth, there is no reason to assume folks are discriminatory. If zoning barred bars then folks would oppose the LGBT bar ... independent of the orientation of the customers. If zoning allowed bars then the orientation of the customers would still not matter.

Comment_arrow

Walter Gale

4:20 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

Lady what doesANY of your uninformed and downright silly objections have to with responsible gun owners anda well run gun store and gun range. Grow up and stop giving us a hard time for YOUR fears!

danny tallsman

9:04 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

I can Not belive anyone would want to ban a shooting range. I am all for it. in fact all of you parents should take your kids to the range and teach them to respect understand and use a fire arm. I bet you have no problem letting them shoot and KILL people Via there video games. I don't get the logic. I took my nephew out to learn how to handle firearms he was 15 and had never touched a firearm of any kind. He thought it would be like all of his video games cool and fun bang bang bang. WHen he shot his first time the look on his face said it all. New found respect. on the way home he told me he was glad that he had experienced the real thing he knows it is not a game. Is education not the key? I am a law abiding citizen. I welcome a place to go and practice shooting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judith Snyder

10:02 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

Shawn, since you obviously don't know me, you are incorrect in your assumption that I would be against a gay bar or any other proposal for improvements in our village. I welcome the opportunity to DISCUSS any propositions that are being considered, and consider myself open to ideas and suggestions. However, the gun proposal was purposely held back from the forum of public and village input. Maybe there is/was a compromise that everyone could live with, we were never given the option to even try.
Ask my kids, my mantra is, 'whatever it is, just tell me". Our residents do deserve better than a postcard in the mail, which is why many of us do actively participate in village life on committees, at events, etc., which is the correct process in place to formulate and plan for our village.

The Police

9:57 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Well, I suppose having a whole bunch of boarded up businesses all up and down our main streets is an acceptable alternative? This place has been in business for over 50 years, started when Lincolnwood was much smaller, and the MAyor was pro business. Look back in history if you will, Lincolnwood had at least 2 gunshops at one time; Shore's and Gabby Hartnett's which had a range. The 60's through the 90's brought great growth and change to town, and this place was a beautiful vibrant place to live in. Then the economy tanked. Look up and down Lincoln, Touhy and Devon. Nothing but vacants, forclosures (like the purple hotel) and blight. The village had better wake up on this. I have never in my years here seen the village look so run down! The gun shop wants to invest in our community, then I say we ought to allow this to happen and quickly before my taxes triple!.

Reply

kevin snow

10:01 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

I had the opportunity to see the gun training facility in Highland park with Mitch Shore and his architect/partner that is for police departments only. This is available to any Police/municipal department at a minimal cost. This facility had concrete walls, floor and ceiling. There are also steel deflectors on the ceiling to deflect stray bullets to the floor.
In this facility, there are still bullet marks in the concrete ceiling and bullet holes in the HVAC overhead.
Mitch's new range WILL NOT HAVE A CONCRETE CEILING! The architect/parrtner said to me they could not afford it. This new facility is NOT state of the art, unlike what they say, if a concrete ceiling is the state of the art. They will only have the wood roof, that is it.
Where will these ocassional stray bullets go that do happen to get around the steel plates, as they clearly do in HP?
Mitch also says that there is a need for this facility to train professionals, but there is a better designed range in HP already that is under-utilized! I go by often and the parking lot is empty.
This to me is about an opportunity for Mitch that with a skirting of good practice in safety design, and a quite changing in safety laws, will make him a lot of money. There are many other business in the area that pay way more than 70k in taxes, so that is a red herring.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

10:16 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Mr. Snow,

First, apologies of a sort. An earlier comment this date was made when this most recent post had not appeared. Not sure how that works.

Anyway, If a new business comes to town and generates an addittional $70K in taxes it's not a red herring because other businesses pay more. It's still an increase.

I would still like to see info vis a vis pistol and or rifle ranges and ceiling materials as state of the art.

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

11:15 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Eral, BTW thanks for being straight on all of this. I do have some access to standards, here are a few:
National Institute of Building Sciences:
Protective Construction: Materials—typically steel, plywood, and concrete—used for sidewalls, baffles, overhead containment, bullet traps, and other areas where a bullet could impact must ensure that the bullet is deflected downrange and not towards the firing line

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

11:28 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

sorry, EARL!
US Dept of Energy (health safety and security): Range Design Criteria
June 2012
"Live-fire ranges should be designed to prevent injury to personnel and to
prevent property damage outside the range from misdirected or accidental
firing and ricochets. They should also be designed to direct ricochets
away from the firing line inside the range."
5 "Floors, Walls, and Ceilings. Indoor range facility floors, walls, and
ceilings must be impenetrable"
7e: "Ceiling. Ceiling material should reduce sound, protect lighting
devices, reflect light and be impenetrable"

kevin snow

10:56 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Earl, thanks for the feedback. Actually, it is a red herring, and here is why. If you watch the last meeting about this, the 70k was stated as taxes gained from an amusement tax. When the mayor was asked if this tax would apply, he said he did not know if it would. its my guess that if the city has changed the laws for distances to schools and parks, and eliminated ALL of the parking requirements, that they will let Mitch go on paying amusement tax. Anyhow, the tax issue will not likely be decided before the zoning is approved.
Regarding concrete ceiling versus none, and the fact that bullets do hit the ceiling as per my onsite observation at a muncipally built range, I would say that it is better design to have a concrete ceiling versus none. do you agree?
Where do you think those stray bullets that clearly left holes in HVAC ducts along the ceiling would have gone? Yes, the would undoubtly lost some velocity going thru sheet metal and wood, but I would argue they would have enough velocity to travel out of the building. Is that acceptable for a range within 900 feet of 3 schools and a park?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

11:15 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

1. MAybe if there is enough feedback they will apply the amusement tax. It's really a pass thru anyway. If the price is competitive people will still pay it.

2. I am not a ballistics or design expert. I don't recall what type of Ceiling Gabby Hartnett's had nor the range in Des Plaines. It would seem there would be a suitable steel alternative. Have not heard of issues with Bullets escaping any indoor range facility, so I can't say if it's an issue or not. Having bullets pierce a ceiling would not be benefuical for the property owner so I would expect there is an incentive to have a design that won't allow this.

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

11:33 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

They said that they are providing the steel plates at an angle, just like in HP. but no comcrete ceiling. Also, the plates in HP do not extend the length of the range. The shore team and the architect told us they would be doing the same, but no concrete or additioanal ceiling as they could not afford it. it would cost to musch to create enought support for the weight of either option from either the walls or the roof.
These guys are spending some money here and are clearly stretching their budget. IMO.

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

12:03 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

See my note on projections from the city of Lincolnwood on taxes: $3000 to 15,000.

kevin snow

10:56 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

ADD...stray bullets that clearly left holes in HVAC ducts AND chips in the concrete ceiling.
I did not take photos of this condition, but ask Mitch and his partner if there are not holes in the HVAC above the range and steel plates in the HP range. Ask if Tehe HP range has a concrete ceiling and if he will be doing the same.

Reply

Lincolnwood 2000

11:43 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

The distance to the closest park is zero feet not 900 feet. The bike trail park was already approved and received grants. The village is in the design phase. The proposed shore gallery property abuts the approved bike trail.

Reply

Lincolnwood 2000

11:43 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

If the business generates 70,000 in taxes, that would put it behind Kohl's, Carson's, Loeber, Grossinger, and Lowes. It would put it well behind the movie theatre that was rejected in Lincolnwood and was built at Village Crosssing. I don't have the numbers here, but it is certainly below future revenue at the purple hotel site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

kevin snow

12:02 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

See my note on projections from the city of Lincolnwood on taxes: $3000 to 15,000.

kevin snow

12:01 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

NEW NEWS!!
This just in from the city, We have the agenda packet for tonight, and in it, the projec ted taxes from this business in amusment taxes, IF they apply them, which the mayor has said he does not know if they will, will be between $3,000 and 15,000. NOT 70k like everbody is saying. Please go online and find this yourself. This is a memp from Tim Weinberg village manager on July 5, 2012 sunjetc FIREAMS DEALERS SPECIAL TAX. This is a projection of taxes BY THE CITY based on income projections by Shore Galleries.
NOT 70,000!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Earl Weiss

2:25 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Seems $15K is a modest projection. That's 5% on $300K Revenue. $300K / 25= 12000 per year. At 6 days a week that is only 38 people a day for 16 lanes. You would think that with 16 lanes it would be more like triple that. Then of course there will be other sales generating tax. Then there may be more real estate taxes as well.
But if increased tax revenue is so important we would not want most bank branches.

Comment_arrow

kevin snow

2:48 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Earl,,,,agian, you are right, sometimes!
Sorry, the correct number on a calculator that actually shows me commas says that Mitch Shore would need to generate 1.4 million in revenue to create 70k in amusement taxes. That is, though, IF:
-the city passes an amusement tax
-the city levies the tax at 5%, their highest projection.
Regardless, the projection is based on numbers from Shore Galleries.

kevin snow

12:23 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

NOT 70K.....
Here is a link to the exact page, the original on the LW site is prretty buried in the entire doc, but if you want more, go to the LW village site.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/82849018@N02/7591492728/in/photostream

Reply

Diane Hoffer

12:53 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

I think you are blowing this out of proportion. Have any of you ever been to an indoor gun range? I would guess most of you hate guns and therefore know nothing about these facilities. They are quiet, you can't even hear it from the outside. Plus, gun owners are most responsible with their weapons. I am sure the owners will build the facility to be very safe. Currently living in CA, we have gun ranges everywhere and it hasn't ever been an issue.

Reply

Walter Gale

4:07 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

You peaple do know that only peaple response able PEAPLE will be using this place why don't don't you liberal nut cases move someplace like another country.

Reply

Elena

10:37 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Walter, you sound like a great American - open minded, sensitive and inclusive. I'm impressed. It is the liberal nut cases that you refer to who are trying to live in a safe society. I find your comments offensive and abusive of people that I assume you do not know. I do not know any of the people who have expressed their opinion for and against. I am not liberal or conservative, but practical and realistic and NO, I will not move to another country. In my opinion, we have way too many guns and violence in this country. I do not want a gun range next door to my home and I know that it would be those wealthy individuals who like to have an arsenal in their homes. However, you could move next door to one if you so choose.

Reply

Leave a comment