A new Skokie ordinance stemming from two separate attacks involving pit bulls may soon require anyone with "vicious animals" to have them spayed or neutered. Owners may also be required to train there dog through special classes. What breeds fall under that category have yet to be determined.
The Skokie Review reports:
"The modified ordinance is likely to provide the village with authority to order that vicious dogs be spayed or neutered. There could be steeper fines and greater clarification about the differences between a “vicious dog” and a “dangerous dog,” officials say."
Over the last several years, only 14 percent of vicious animal attacks in Skokie involved pit bulls, the Review noted.
Authorities and village officials believe in many cases it isn't the breed that causes the attack, but the owner's lack of training for the canine.
What do you think? Should pit bulls be banned in Illinois? Or should owner's require mandatory training for certain breeds? What do you think the solution -if there should be one - should be?
Chime your thoughts by casting a vote or making a comment below.
Editor's note: We understand this is a hot button issue and support neither side; we just want to hear what the community thinks. Also, the Village of Skokie is not looking to ban pit bulls. If you have any questions or concerns please shoot me an email at georges@patch.com. Thanks!
Connie Hoffmann
9:35 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
When a dog's behavior is unacceptable, look to the OWNER. Owner's are responsible for properly training and controlling their animals. I was attacked by a chihuahua [yes, a chihuahua!] and have nearly been licked to death by every pit bull I've met to date. Blame the DEED, not the breed. Education is the key and the Village of Skokie needs to educate itself before making knee-jerk decisions.
hillary a. lichtenstein
12:01 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
look to the owner is right! Skokie really does need to educate itself. i don't know why there has to be an all-or-nothing stance on a particular dog breed. Skokie, be smart and don't make a rash decision.
Patrick Dennison
6:18 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Hmmm...I used to think it was the owner until my dog was attacked by a local pitbull. This pitbull is well known throughout my community as one of the sweetest dogs around and has never hurt another dog or person ever. Walking through the neighborhood one day with my 3 month old puppy we happened to come upon this pitbull and her owner. I asked the owner before we approached if it was ok for our dog to walk up. He responded that it was perfectly ok and that his dog was nice and has never attacked anyone or any dog. So the dogs walked up to eachother and within seconds the pitbull went straight for my dogs face and ended up biting her tongue and my dog was left with an inch and a half rip down her tongue and ended up getting nine stiches. So was that the owners fault?So how does a dog that has never attacked another dog or person just decide one day to attack? Oh and the owner is a great guy extremely nice I know him well now. I used to think it was all the owners but after this incident I'm not sure what to think. Anyone have any input?
sarah andrews
10:59 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
I agree it is how the dog is raised. I have a female pitt bull that was rescued at 2 months old and she is afraid of her own shadow. she is so lovey dovey and doesn't hurt other people or other dogs.
Rosanna Lorusso
4:31 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
Show support
Rosanna Lorusso
4:33 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
Donna Burman
10:01 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I agree with Connie. It is the owner of the animal. When I was young, it was
dobermans and german shephards. Ordinances that refect owner responsibility, regardless of the breed, should be addressed.
Rosanna Lorusso
4:33 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
Melissa Berman
10:30 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I too agree with Connie. Sadly, as a life long pittie owner/trainer and former resident of a nearby town to Skokie, this problem will never be resolved. I live in a town now where pits have been banned for over 18 years and it's never stopped me from walking them proudly! I want people to realize, even after they criticize me, that these are beautiful creatures and you just have to treat them with responsibility.
Rosanna Lorusso
4:33 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
regina gleyzer
10:32 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
We have a pittbull and she is the sweetest dog in the building and the neighborhood. She doesn't bother other dogs, and doesn't even bark back at them. She is solely there to be loyal to her family.
Rosanna Lorusso
4:34 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
Katie Christine Wood
10:49 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
no! i have had many pits and pit mixes they are the best dogs ever! i love them to death!
Rosanna Lorusso
4:34 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
Anna Riley
10:51 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
My 6 year old is autistic. We spent a long time with local shelters trying to find a breed and a dog that would be patient with my son. You know what *perfect* dog we found? A pit bull mix. Yes folks 2 1/2 year old pit bull mix rescue has the patience to be a wonderful companion to my autistic son. Please don't take this friend away from him!
Rosanna Lorusso
4:34 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
Skokie Mike
10:53 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
This breed was bred to fight. They were once war dogs. That is in their DNA, temperament. We can't ignore that. Yes, the right people can make these wonderful dogs. But how many dopes do you see with this dog? I see a lot! They ruined it for everyone! I say yes, the breed should be banned. This is a dangerous dog in the wrong hands!
Anna Riley
11:44 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Skokie Mike any medium to large sized dog is dangerous in the wrong hands. The only alternative is to ban all medium and large dog breeds. Does that seem reasonable? The DNA of dogs was originally wolf DNA, that's the DNA of dogs. Not that wikipedia is the end all of information but here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_domestic_dog
So dog DNA is wolf DNA. Should we ban all dogs? How far back in DNA do you want to go?
Andria Moffat
3:16 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012
These dogs also were known as nanny dogs too. Doesn’t it make sense to go after the “dopes” as opposed to the dogs and the responsible owners? Please show me any evidence that shows that it is in their DNA. What people like you don't understand is that advocates of the breed want to stop the irresponsible and neglectful owners more than you do, if we all worked together instead of against we would accomplish more. Breed bans have been proven to be ineffective and costly. The estimated cost per year to enforce this in Illinois is $17,868,850 and I am pretty sure the state does not have the money to spend!
the dude
1:41 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
that's moronic, there is nothing in the DNA that makes pitbulls attack, it's all in the way they are trained
the dude
1:42 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
you got owned down below, toolbag
Rothom
6:26 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Skokie Mike and all the others with the same mentality: Maybe the types of people who allow, and/or encourage their dogs (whatever the breed) should be banned, netured or spayed and euthanized if they can't be educated! imo.
Ashlei Diana Fiorentino
1:01 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
I refuse to let my children around pits...I don't care if it is someones sweet pet the evidence against them doesnt lie...I don't doubt that some are amazing dogs with the RIGHT OWNER...But too many idiots own puts...Compare the numbers...I don't own those breeds because I am looking out for my family...Pits were breed to be working dogs...would you buy a ticking time bomb and not expect it to go off..
http://www.thebullyhouse.net/pitbullproducts/breakingsticks.html
That is coming from a pit fan page...now tell me they aren't aggressive if they are sweet and loving all the time why is that needed...My female lab we just lost to cancer refused to even close her mouth if you put your hand in it...I took food out of her mouth with no repercussion...She just turned and sat and waited for me to give it back wagging her tail because she thought I was playing a game...I never even heard that dog growl... Im not saying that they should all be dead but they def. shouldn't be a wide spread as they are and if people love their pits they need to be responsible and keep them in their homes because the min one comes running in my yard it will be shot because Im not going to risk my pets lives or my kids or family...
Other dogs do attack but they don't do even close to the damage pits do...Pits don't know when to stop...
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fbslforpitsmakessense.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fpit-bull-attacks-understand-danger.html&h=SAQGKft_h
Jen
9:32 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Ashlei, any dog can bite, maul or kill. You, as a dog owner with children, have a responsibility to be aware of that. Don't ever trust your dog 100%. It's just not worth it. Every dog owner should be able to take food out of their dog's mouth, handle their body, feet, ears, tails. I can put my face in my dogs' bowls and pretend to eat their food. That doesn't mean I would leave them unattended with very young children.
http://www.k9magazine.org/labrador-puppy-kills-baby/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003849/Boy-3-left-horrific-facial-injuries-Labrador-savages-Poole-Harbour.html#ixzz1UXuVQ1l5
Please, please, please don't assume that Labs are always safe. They are not. As you can read in the article above about the Lab puppy that tore into a young boy's face at a park while his mother was petting the owner's other dog, she thought she didn't need to watch her son because "It's only a Lab, Labs don't bite."
Jen
9:40 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
P.S. Ashlei, you state that pit bulls are working dogs. Most dogs are working dogs. Labs are working dogs, as are golden retrievers, pointers, shepherds, border collies, Australian shepherds, Bernese Mountain dogs, Maremmas, poodles and many other breeds. Not many breeds are bred without a working dog purpose.
Beth C.
10:59 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
People who are irresponsible, letting their animals wander, or worse abusing them and teaching them the wrong things (people who dogfight, etc) are ALREADY breaking laws. A ban will NOT dissuade them. The only people and animals who will be affected by a ban are the law abiding families who seek the proper care and training for their four legged family members.
As a certified vet tech with several years of experience working in a shelter, I cannot support any sort of breed ban. 'Pitbulls' are very rarely the cause of problems, being smart, loving, and loyal dogs, even if they have a history of being mistreated. They were once called the "nanny dog" because they were so highly regarded as family animals. Its the PEOPLE who need to be held accountable for letting them wander, not training (or bad training), abandoning them, abuses, irresponsible breeding, etc. Its the PEOPLE who cause the problem in these cases - NOT THE DOGS!
It may seem like pitbulls are always the ones being reported for bites, etc, but that is only because people ASSUME any aggressive dog is a pit. MANY other breeds also have issues that go unreported. It doesn't sell papers to talk about the collie biting people the same way it does when a assumed 'pitbull' does. But it still happens.
The slogan "Ban the Deed, NOT the Breed" is really the way to approach this. Its not the breed's fault people are irresponsible or outright cruel. The fault is in the people who force them to be this way.
Skokie Mike
11:04 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
And when will you hold the people responsible? After the dog has mauled and killed a child? This is why we can't have this breed. I've never read about a golden retriever killing a person before ....
Anna Riley
11:08 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Skokie Mike, before pit bulls it was german shepherds and rottweilers. Where does it end? Should we ban every breed that has ever bitten anyone?
Shelia Town
11:12 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
http://retrieverman.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/golden-retriever-mix-kills-baby-in-south-carolina/
Julia
11:21 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
To Skokie Mike -
(granted these are based on media reports, which often exclude breed information) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States
March 16, 2007
Golden Retriever
Pamela Rushing 50 years old
Killed by her own dogs;[94]
June 28, 2008
Golden Retriever-mix
Lorraine May 74 years old
Killed by her son's dogs[130]
March 4, 2009
Chow-Golden Retriever mix
"Jane Doe" 2 weeks old
Killed by her family's dog[151]
If you search the web for just bites involving goldens (or any other breed) you will find hundreds. Blaming the breed instead of the person on the other end of the leash is counterproductive. But labeling a breed as 'dangerous' you are just encouraging people who want 'dangerous' dogs to get them and train them to be 'dangerous'.
Anna Riley
11:02 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
http://www.ywgrossman.com/photoblog/?p=676
Anna Riley
11:09 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Skokie Mike both are accurate because they are information that we hope to be accurate about history right? The fact is that this breed was the "nanny dog" for children in the U.S. for years! When did we start to vilify the breed?
Shelia Town
11:11 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
If you kill every pit, every doberman, every shepherd, every rottie, bad owners will still exist and they will just use a different dog/breed to use for aggression & to make up for their lack of masculinity
Stephanie Rea
11:26 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
It's the DEED not the BREED...
Any dog can bite/attack... so don't be ignorant, be smart and look at stats. BSL does NOOOOOOOOOOOT work!
Period.
Anna Riley
11:40 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
We are about to adopt a pit bull mix who is fantastic with our active 3 year old and autistic 6 year old from a fantastic shelter called "Chicago Pit Stop Rescue"
http://chicagopitstop.org
Please don't ban a breed that was the "nanny dog" for years. The rescue dog we are getting is Biggy and he is sweet and beautiful with my 2 sons. I couldn't have asked for a better family companion!
Skokie Mike
11:58 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Anna -
I think that is great that you found a dog to help you with your child. My question is: What will your dog do when another dog (friendly) comes near your child? Or what will your dog do when a person comes near your child and your dog has a knee jerk reaction? It will attack, with devastating force.
That's what I am worried about. These dogs are SO loyal to their owners. No question about that. I know how emotional they can get. But those emotions can trigger a violent attack if the dog feels threatened.
Anna Riley
12:12 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Skokie Mike we already know how he does with other dogs. He has met our current GSD and was wonderful He is living in a foster house with 4 other dogs. He has been to many adoption events. He was beautiful every where.
I already know how he is around other people when he is with his family because he has been in a foster home for a while and has been beautiful.
A GSD is very loyal as well. In fact when I asked our vet about which "breed" would be good for our house another GSD or a pit bull she said a pit bull.
As the link I posted above shows about the last 100 years or so in the US with the "pit bull" breed that they are loving good "nanny dogs". I am not sure why they have been so vilified except that many of them got in the hands of people *trained* them to fight.
Iva Mihaylova
11:57 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Pit bulls are the most loving and faithful dogs if not raised on purpose for fighting. Pitbulls from loving homes make the best pets. They are gentle, patient and faithful to death. This is what pitbulls are - http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c3#/video/us/2012/05/09/dnt-ma-dog-pulls-owner-off-train-tracks.wcvb
Skokie, please don't ban them! They deserve only to be loved!
John Tobin
12:00 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
The main problems with pit bulls, as I see it, is not the owner, nor the training or lack there of, but the potential for damage from the pit bull bite. If they were to bite no more often than other breeds, or even less often, the stakes are so high that the risk is unreasonable. So, I think they should no longer be bred: all existing pit bulls should be neutered, breeding them should be outlawed, and those having a history of aggressive behavior should be euthanized. John Tobin
Kate
1:42 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Wow, and to think that when my husband used to beat me I could have had him euthanized and had ALL other men castrated. Where were you 25 years ago, a**face.
Anna Riley
1:56 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Many of the large breeds have strong jaws. As a child our German Shepherd would carry around logs that were several hundred pounds in her mouth as a toy. Should all large dogs with large jaws be outlawed?
Amy Rosen
2:35 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Show me some stats/evidence that supports they have more damage per bite?... If you ban the pit, people will just decide another breed is the one to turn violent. They'll get into dobermans (those are the dogs people were trying to ban in the 70s) or German Sheppard, or mastiffs, or chihuahuas...whatever, it doesn't matter the breed. It's never mattered the breed. People will just ruin some other breeds reputation. it's just stupid
Ashlei Diana Fiorentino
1:11 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Agreed
Lisa
12:00 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
There's no evidence that breed bans have been successful in reducing bites, and many places are reversing them. It's not a terrible idea for dogs over a certain weight to be required to take a training class or even to be muzzled in public. Different countries have applied such ordinances. But singling out pit bulls - to the extent they're even identifiable as a breed, which is questionable - is ridiculous. Irresponsible owners will just get another big breed.
Dana DiCarlo
12:25 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Their bite is no different than any other medium/large dog. How about the jack russell who attacked a baby recently should we ban them? I was attacked by a border collie, should they be banned? Bet you didn't hear about the pitbull who recently saved her owner from a freight train and took the blow for her. All anyone wants to blame pitties for every bite and attack. A lab is more likely to attack than a pit. Where's the let ban labs??? OWNERS are the ones who need to pay for their irresponsibility not the dogs. All breeds have their issues. Make sure you know what you're getting into when you get a pet. I know that just because my pittie isn't animal aggressive now, that doesn't mean he won't change as he gets older. We watch him with other dogs and animals. We know what to look for and we don't let him roam the streets cause we know he will defend himself if attacked.
Ashlei Diana Fiorentino
1:13 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fbslforpitsmakessense.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fpit-bull-attacks-understand-danger.html&h=SAQGKft_h
Pitmama1
12:53 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I do not want this breed banded I have gone through training classes and tonight we go back I think there is nothing wrong with having to go to training classes I think it's very important we start up with our classes again tonight we did basic training and now we are doing intermedet and we will move on to advanced training that has rally my pit loves doing training I say let's go to school and she go by where her leash is and sits and waits to have it put on her. Not everyone is a good owner for this breed they are very sweet, loyal, wanting to please their master but if the wrong person gets hold and miss treats this dog by fighting it because they think it's cool I think that person should be hung by their toes from a tree. These dogs are not meant to be human aggressive it's bad humans that make them aggressive and try and break them. A polite well behaved pit is what we need to help change peoples minds that this breed is not bad but it is the humans that get ahold of these dogs that really make them bad from not being a Responable owner. I know many and live by many people who have pit bulls and all are sweet dogs that get along well with other people and dogs. Please don't band this breed!! Band stupied people from getting ahold of this breed and miss treating it.
Jen
1:37 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Hi Skokie Mike, I own two pit mixes--one a registered therapy dog that goes into our local middle school, care centers, works with adults with developmental disabilities and at a mental health clinic. If you are at all familiar with these sorts of surroundings you will know that it takes a solid temperament of dog to be calm around non-verbal folks, people who might smell differently, wear odd looking clothing, yell, hug the dog hard, and often walk with an uneven gait, use wheelchairs/walkers, etc.). My therapy dog is almost 6 yrs. old and is a favorite in all these locales.
Both my dogs attend dog daycare, participate in agility and nose work classes. In fact, the agility instructor had me put my male pit bull between a Vizsla and a shepherd mix the other night because my dog is calm and ignores the other dogs and those two were trying to tangle with each other.
I would simply ask that you realize that regardless of genetics, dogs are individuals just like humans. I don't know if you have siblings, but are you identical in looks, personality, job choices, food likes, emotions to your siblings? In my family of 5, I can sure tell you that even though we have the same parents none of my siblings are alike.
Skokie Mike
1:42 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Jen -
You seem like a wonderful owner. I really wish there were more dog owners like you. But what about the kids I see with their pants hanging below their knees walking a pit? Or the dope that just leaves his pit tied up in the backyard because he think that will solve his security problem? What about those people?
Should we wait until the pit kills someone to punish them? Why? Why should we wait for a life to be taken to take action? When this dog attacks, it is scary and deadly. I don't care what data you show me or what you say - no dog has a deadlier bit than a pit bull. None.
That is my concern - there isn't enough people like you - or the others here that I am sure are great pit owners - to warrant the idiots who have one.
fostermama
2:21 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Then, Skokie Mike, "those people" should not have dogs -- regardless of breed. You take pit bulls away and they'll find another medium/large sized intimidating-looking dog to tie out back, to fight, to walk down the street "with their pants hanging below their knees."
My feeling is that if we can't cull the whole breed (and let's face it, banning them won't cull the breed -- it'll only make matters worse), then maybe the answer is to have MORE responsible people like Jen (and myself) handling their dogs in a responsible manner. Banning a breed of dog only takes that dog out of the hands of those who choose to abide by the law. Those who wish to ignore the law in other ways (dogfighting, not licensing, not leashing, etc) will not likely be dissuaded by a breed ban.
Ashlei Diana Fiorentino
1:23 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
I think you sound like the perfect owner for a pit but there are too many who don't do that...I personally own a lab puppy (we just lost out 5 your old lab to cancer and we got a puppy a few days ago) and I know that a lab is an energetic smart loyal dog who drives to please us...I also have small children so we watch the dog/s ever close and we take her outside to run off energy and play ball and such and my husband will be training her to hunt...To many people don't do what is best for the dog...You obviously keep your dogs busy so that they are happy healthy and their minds busy...The problem is dogs become destructive as you probably know when they aren't stimulated personally I have found in the winter our lab would pace and run around the house and chew more...Pits on the other hand can become very aggressive so of those that aren't stimulated like you do for your its dangerous and since Pits do more damage its scary...I won't say they should all be killed but they should be kept in rural areas not cities...Thats my opinion I would not own one because I don't want to be responsible for the outcome...I even crate my dog around new people because if my big dog knocks someone down it can hurt them and When you own a large breed you have to be responsible
Rosanna Lorusso
1:42 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I have a pit bull and he is the sweetest dog ever.. Any dog can be mean its all how u raise them.. Same goes for kids of there not raised properly ur kid will grow up not knowing right from wrong..
Jen
1:43 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Also, why would those of us who have put our heart and soul into training our dogs choose a different dog? In my wide-ranging experience, my dogs are model citizens. I have heard about violent dog fights among dogs that live together which include border collies/Aussies, Old English sheepdogs, Labs, huskys, golden retrievers, you name it. Yet my dogs have never fought with each other. Dogs are dogs, period. Each dog has the potential to do great harm. As the above posters pointed out, pretty much all breeds of dogs have done great harm under the wrong circumstances.
In a medical study in Colorado, Labs were responsible for 13.7% of facial bites to children.
"The dogs were not breeds usually associated with attacks. Durairaj found that mixed breeds were responsible for 23 percent of bites followed by Labrador retrievers at 13.7 percent. Rottweilers launched attacks in 4.9 percent of cases, German shepherds 4.4 percent of the time and Golden retrievers 3 percent. The study was done in the Denver area where pit bulls are banned."
ttp://www.ucdenver.edu/about/newsroom/newsreleases/Pages/DogBiteConcern.aspx
Jen
1:44 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
And last, but not least, another medical study for you:
Quote from the Ontario Medical Veterinary Association Committee Hearing Testimony:
"A study by the Canadian hospitals injury reporting and prevention program examined the dog breeds involved in attacks that were serious enough that the victim sought medical attention at one of eight reporting hospitals. The study revealed that 50 different types of purebreds and 33 types of crossbreeds had been involved in the attacks, the most common breeds being German shepherds, cocker spaniels, Rottweilers and golden retrievers."
Bex Allen
1:45 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Ban? No. But mandatory training and neutering? ABSOLUTELY. There are too many jerks backyard-breeding pitbulls and selling them to anyone who asks. There's a reason shelters are overflowing with pittie mixes. Training is extra important for pitties too - not because they are inherently aggressive or hard to train, but because their reputation is soiled by people who abuse and mistreat them. If you adopt a pitbull, you should be responsible and put in the training effort needed to make your dog an ambassador of the breed!
Kate
1:52 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I concur 100%, where have you been all my life ???? <3
the dude
2:49 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
mandatory training to own a dog? mandatory mutilation of your pet? pretty sick if you ask me! no, that's a very bad, fascist idea. just how would you even enforce this? send police to every home demanding to see what kind of dog they have, its training papers and its nuts?
Anna Riley
5:51 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
The dude I understand where you are coming from but I am going to have to politely disagree with calling having your animal fixed "mutilation". To spay/neuter is not "mutilation". In fact there are health benefits for your pet when you have you dog and/or cat fixed.
http://www.aspca.org/pet-care/spayneuter/spay-neuter-top-ten.aspx
Debarking, clipping ears and tails for purely cosmetic reasons, that's surgical mutilation. Having your animal fixed is not.
Kate
1:53 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Ev1 trying to reason with an unreasonable person is practicing an exercise in futility.
I say we take away Skokie Mike's booze because people misuse it and kill hundreds every year all over the world by drunk driving, something that's TOTALLY avoidable.....Lets marinate in that for a minute.....
L Aguilar
1:59 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Skokie Mike, ANY dog in the wrong hands is a dangerous animal!!! I am sick of people singling out this breed as if it's from another planet! Yes, I have one, and I wouldn't trade her; she's great with cats and loyal, sweet, etc. all the things we love about our dogs, no matter the breed, and things opponents gladly overlook. English BULLdogs, BULL Mastiffs, all the other BULLY breeds are known as wonderful family pets. English bulldogs were also bred for fighting/baiting bulls, but I've never met an aggressive one; it's been bred out of them. Take an aggressive male of any breed and mate it to an aggressive female and you get puppies with aggressive traits, of ANY breed, or animal for that matter.
Do you know that Chihuahas are responsible for more bites -but they don't make the news. Did you read about Lilly, the Pit Bull in the Boston area who pulled her unconscious owner off the railroad tracks as a freight train approached? She lost her front leg in the process.
I say the DOPES and THUGS who brutalize these animals should be banned. Make it socially unacceptable to fight dogs and brutalize animals and stop glamorizing the thug and criminal element and that will take care of it. Maybe they should be prohibited from owning one, like they're prevented from owning firearms.
I don't currently live in IL, but if they ban these dogs, I won't be able to go home, and my girly won't be able to visit her 'grandma', and 'her' cat.
Amy Rosen
2:15 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
You ban this breed and the same jackasses who ruined their (individual) pit bulls are going to get other breeds and ruin those individual dogs. Banning the breed will do nothing.
Jen
3:30 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Fostermama, I couldn't have said it better. It's the uneducated and downright "I don't care" owners who will never abide the law and just move on to another tough looking dog. Somehow those owners need to be made accountable BEFORE incidents happen. There are an awful lot breeds that can be used for the exact purpose that some pit bulls are.
There are successful programs in some cities to educate young dog owners (like the ones Skokie Mike refers to). They teach them how to train humanely, why dog fighting is not cool, etc. The people teaching the course are often prior tough guys who participated in fighting dogs and came to their senses. What better advocates to teach right from wrong to the misguided youth. I've watched some videos on how getting through to our younger generation can make all the difference in the world. Young men and women who join gangs usually have a very hard life and acquiring a tough dog fits in their desired image.
Tim Biars
4:44 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
As a pitbull owner (on my second rescue) I think banning them is not the answer. I do think however strict rules should be in place if you want to own the breed. It would discourage people who are not serious about wanting the breed to look elsewhere. Frankly put, I've had it with people who get them based on looks and have NO intentions on fulfilling the needs of the breed. The dogs end up in shelters and almost always the dog involved is not spayed or neutered. Mandatory training? Yes! License to own? Yes! Banning the breed all out? No! I also think that breeders should be limited to how many times they can breed dogs in one year, not just one particular dog, but how many times they allow dogs to have puppies. If you are going to have them, then you should be licensed to breed and sell them to homes that meet certain guidelines that hold the pet owner responsible for taking care of the dog. Not a licensed breeder? Then it should be mandatory you spay or neuter your animal. I think once people realize why its important to properly train and spay or neuter the problem will be solved. Allowing just anyone to own the breed is dangerous. I'm not saying elitists should only have the breed, but responsible people able to prove they have the means to take care of the dog for everyone's safety.
the dude
5:38 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
mandatory training to own a dog? mandatory mutilation of your pet? pretty sick if you ask me! no, that's a very bad, fascist idea. just how would you even enforce this? send police to every home demanding to see what kind of dog they have, its training papers and its nuts? nobody should have to obtain some permission from any government official or body to own a dog. this is fascism plain and simple...
Jen
5:45 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Hi Tim, in a perfect world, your suggestions would make sense. Unfortunately, most animal control shelters/authorities, if even existing, are so understaffed and overworked that there is absolutely no way to enforce who is licensed, who has followed through with training, who is breeding, etc. As it stands, most animal control officers cannot even enforce leash laws.
Having different requirements for certain breeds, makes them all the more attractive to criminals or tough wannabees and forces breeding underground. If you research areas where even mandatory s/n of pit bulls has been instituted, what happens is that responsible people follow the law; the bad owners simply turn their dogs over to animal control or let them loose. I have read horror stories of loose pit bulls running loose in Ontario when they instituted the ban. Many people cannot afford s/n and I don't care enough about their dogs to rehome them, so they do what they think is the next best thing, give them up, whether that be to dump them in a field or the shelter, where they will probably be euthanized because of the stricter rules with respect to that breed of dog.
Anna Riley
5:52 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
The dude I understand where you are coming from but I am going to have to politely disagree with calling having your animal fixed "mutilation". To spay/neuter is not "mutilation". In fact there are health benefits for your pet when you have you dog and/or cat fixed.
http://www.aspca.org/pet-care/spayneuter/spay-neuter-top-ten.aspx
Debarking, clipping ears and tails for purely cosmetic reasons, that's surgical mutilation. Having your animal fixed is not.
the dude
11:37 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
my dog has his balls intact and will always have his balls intact
Anna Riley
5:47 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
The dude whether or not you have your dog fixed is of course your choice. I just wanted to make the point that having an animal fixed is *not* surgical mutilation. There are in fact health benefits to your animal if you do not to mention it keeps pet over population down by not making new animals that also need homes. However having your dogs ears clipped and tail cropped for purely cosmetic reasons (simply for the viewing pleasure of the animal's owner) is a form of surgical mutilation because there is no purpose other than the viewing pleasure of the surgical alteration. Subjecting an animal to anesthesia and post surgery trauma and pain just for the "look" is in my humble opinion unkind. However the decision to have our animals fixed is not mutilation. It is a decision we made to extend the life of our animal and to keep the unwanted animal population down.
For more information on the benefits to fixing your pet click here:
http://www.aspca.org/pet-care/spayneuter/spay-neuter-top-ten.aspx
Thank you for your understanding.
Patrick Dennison
6:20 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Hmmm...I used to think it was the owner until my dog was attacked by a local pitbull. This pitbull is well known throughout my community as one of the sweetest dogs around and has never hurt another dog or person ever. Walking through the neighborhood one day with my 3 month old puppy we happened to come upon this pitbull and her owner. I asked the owner before we approached if it was ok for our dog to walk up. He responded that it was perfectly ok and that his dog was nice and has never attacked anyone or any dog. So the dogs walked up to eachother and within seconds the pitbull went straight for my dogs face and ended up biting her tongue and my dog was left with an inch and a half rip down her tongue and ended up getting nine stiches. So was that the owners fault?So how does a dog that has never attacked another dog or person just decide one day to attack? Oh and the owner is a great guy extremely nice I know him well now. I used to think it was all the owners but after this incident I'm not sure what to think. Anyone have any input?
Jen
9:46 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
That's what my friend said last night on a hike, Patrick, when his dog was attacked by a black Lab that unexpectedly attacked and tore his golden retriever's ear open. The owner of the Lab was horrified and she her dog had never done anything like that. Dogs will be dogs. It's up to us to do the best we can, but not all dogs will like each other and their method of dealing with dislike is to use teeth.
That doesn't mean my friend thinks just because his dog was attacked by a "friendly" black Lab that all black Labs are evil.
Jen
9:58 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
If you have studied dog body language, there would have been clear signs that the pit bull was aroused (stiff body, tail straight out, tensed muscles, sometimes even a wagging tail) and the owner, regardless of whether his dog is normally friendly should have picked up on that and pulled his dog back. I always watch my dogs closely when they meet other dogs, although mine are very socialized going into stores, outdoor restaurants and downtown due to therapy dog work. There are entire classes on how to read a dog's body language.
Also, the statistics show that dogs on leash tend to be more aggressive than dogs off leash. You didn't say if the dogs were on leash. However, dogs that do not know each other have a higher chance of tangling. Also, did your puppy jump on the pit bull's face at all? Sometimes that's a factor.
Having said all that, I am very cautious when around a small puppy. My female is a great dog to teach puppies. My 70-lb. male just wants to play, which I don't let him do because he didn't learn how to put the brakes on when he was a stray pup himself.
I say, yes, it was the owner's fault. He should have had better control of his dog, no matter how friendly, when approaching a strange dog and especially a puppy. For your sake, I hope your pup doesn't fear all large dogs now. That can be a traumatic experience and I'm sorry it happened to you and your pup. But it could have been any dog breed.
pitmama
7:13 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Skokie Mike.... You're a moron. Hands down a freaking idiotic fool. Believe me... I'd be more of a threat to you than my pitbull ever would be. You have a skewed perception of reality.
Rosanna Lorusso
4:38 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088?ref=notif¬if_t=page_new_likes
christina
7:32 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
How about we ban vehicles because people get injured and die in car accidents and ban all weapons because they can get into "dopes" hands. How about we ban the internet because it can be a gateway for child pornography. As well as alcohol, cigarettes, etc. What a rediculous suggestion. It is scary when incompetent people make decisions on stereotypes/ prejudices. Just like when our country used to sterilize mentally challenged people to prevent them from reproducing. Or we did not allow freedoms to other sexes or races. Nothing good comes from small thinking hateful minds. Skokie
christina
7:36 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Mike I hope (but suspect) this stereotypical thinking doesn't apply to other area of your life. If it didn't I'd believe u would realize u can't put a label on anything. Every creature has an individual nature. When in history has it ever been a logical answer or solution to punish a group for what maybe a few may b responsible for.
Skokie Mike
7:53 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
@ Christina -
Can we try and not take my words and radically throw them out of context? I see part of the problem with even discussing this question is there are so many extreme pit / dog lovers that they bully anyone who opposes their view. It isn't crazy to ask this question.
Belivie it or not people, Skokie Mike actually lived with a pitbull before. I know! Crazy! I've been a dog owner my whole life. While the pit wasn't mine (this pit actually nurtured my dog when she was a puppy) I am not oblivious to the dog's makeup. The dog is all muscle, and can withstand pain that would pulverize humans or other dogs. It's jaw can lock up too, after it bites. The breed is insanely protective of its owners, too. Sometimes, these dogs make bad judgement calls - even ones raised by good familiys. When it attacks it is devastating. Yes, a little chiuaha bites, but it will never tear your hand off.
Since were throwing out stats, go look up how these dogs had to be brought down when they did attack. Baseball bats, knives don't even slow them down when they lose it.
That's the other side of the story that others feel. I tried discussing this critically and respectfully and all I get is bullied and called a nazi. That's not fair. Give people a chance to speak their opinion and reply respectfully. Thats fair.
Jayme182
8:20 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Really, Skokie Mike? At least get your "facts" straight.
"The dog is all muscle, and can withstand pain that would pulverize humans or other dogs. It's jaw can lock up too, after it bites."
NOT TRUE! The "locking jaw" is a complete myth. Look it up. And pits don't even come CLOSE to having the strongest jaw out of all the breeds of dogs. They aren't even considered large breed dogs - they are a medium breed. Most large breeds and any giant breed dog has a stronger bite than a pit.
What you fail to understand is that there are many GOOD pit owners out there. You have to know how to handle them and they aren't for everyone - but they are amazing, obedient, and loyal family dogs when in the right hands.
christina
7:46 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Hateful narrow minded people have no buisness being in a position of authority to make insane decisions
christina
8:15 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I am not an extreme pit lover. I own labs and understand that any dog has the potential to do damage and protect their owner. Esp a fearful one. Socializing and training is an important role in raising a dog. Also knowing your dog and what takes it out of its comfort zone. I am not calling u a Nazi but being in a upper management position I realize you have to take a bigger look at the picture and assess other solutions. Banning pitbulls will not eliminate dog attacks. Nor is it good for public relations. U need to be creative...ask for others opinions and research to educate yourself. U had people recommending mandatory obediance training. There is a start in the right direction. Not saying it is the right solution but it is not a radical decision. U said the problem is that "dopes" own them. What I know about irresponsible people is that they don't like to follow rules. How many drug dealers quit selling because it's illegal? What u will do is take the pitbulls from their responsible owners, but I don't think they will completely leave your town. Their are many dogs that have a natural guard instinct. Some not as common like the Tibetan mastiff. Which I deem far more dangerous than a pit. All I'm saying is I wrongly recommend u continue to educate yourself and come up with a rational decision. If u can't do it on your own ask for opinions or pray for the right answer
christina
8:21 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
It is important to stand up for someone or something that is incapable to stand up for itself.
Jayme182
8:24 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
It is a shame that good stories like this one don't make the headlines:
http://now.msn.com/now/0509-dog-saves-owner.aspx#scptm2
christina
8:57 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Why don't you look up the American temperament test society breed statistics or other reliable evidence based research. It may open your eyes to breed specific bans. Their are 15 breeds of dogs proven to be the most dangerous and pitbull failed to make their list. Just trying to help
christina
9:13 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Dr Brady Hard did reaserch for national geographic and proved that pitbulls have less jaw strength than German shepards and rottweilers. Pits jaw force was found to be way less than the average dogs 320 lbs of bite force. And after I Lehr Brisbin phd disected opitbull skulls he found their is no evidence of existance of a jaw locking mechanism. Thus evidence has been used in court. And the court affirmed this testimony to be true.
Brian
10:26 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I am a firefighter/paramedic with a large municipality fire dept. in Illinois, and while I was not on this particular call, thank God, some of my coworkers responded to a call of a baby that was killed by a Dachsund. A freakin' weiner dog. How about that. And I also own a pit mix and he is a big wimp. Would never hurt my 5 and 2 year old kids.
Skokie Mike
11:18 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Yes there's research and stats that can say anything, IMO.
Look at this, I just did a search *today* on Google News for "Pit Bull Killing" Look how many recent ones popped up. Please don't be oblivious to this side of the story.
https://www.google.com/search?q=pit+bull+killing&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=pit+bull+killing&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=icg&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=imvnsu&source=lnms&tbm=nws&ei=6ECrT8uHIoyi8QTKroka&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=5&ved=0CBoQ_AUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=5fba472cb9c0cced&biw=1280&bih=600
Jen
10:10 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Hi Mike, Jen here again. Here's a link to the National Canine Research Council, an organization comprised of dog experts (they list their board members and advisors on the site if you want to take a look) that researches, sometimes for up to a year, all the dog bite related fatalities we read about, many of which are blamed on pit bulls by the media when it is eventually determined it wasn't a pit bull.
Please read the 2011 and prior investigations and you will find that often the media gets it wrong. But most importantly, the background of the dog and how it was incorporated into the family (or not), trained, chained, fed and watered (or not), plays a huge role in attacks.
Thanks in advance for considering this. I'm still willing to carry on a conversation with you!
http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/dogbites/dog-bite-related-fatalities/
Lola's Dad
2:12 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
You're the one sir who is "oblivious". Search any breed of dog killing on google and something is gonna pop up. Doberman, German Shepard, Mastiff, retriever, Rottweiler, all of these dogs can be bigger in size and cause damage with a bite to the point of death. Please tell me why Pitt bulls are different. All your doing is throwing in "facts" that are complete myths and fabrications, you even admit a pitty nurtured your dog when it was a puppy. Did that pit ever do anything wrong to you or your dog? I would guess not or we would have heard all about it already. Any dog big or small has potential to kill, they are animals, it is our responsibility to train them, care for them and put them in situations to succeed. Thugs and dopes have Pitt bulls you say? They also have guns too, should we ban those as well, wait... we do have a law against concealed weapons in Illinois and one against convicted criminals owning guns. How's that working out for us? How about you ask your wonderful information source (Google) and get back to me. I can respect a mans opinion if he uses facts gained from personal experience, but your argument uses no real facts, just hearsay, myths and a google search. Troll
Rosanna Lorusso
10:53 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-bulls-are-great-dogs-Skokie/185665194890088
Rosanna Lorusso
10:53 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
like the page pit bull lovers
green guy
12:11 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
I'm a dog lover and I own two pit bull type dogs that I rescued. I think all dogs, regardless of breed should be required to be spade/neutered. Something like 4-6 million dogs in the US are euthanized each year. Pit bull types are the most likely to be euthanized because they are often breed by idiots and there are just wayyy to many of them and few people are willing to adopt them out of fear. The cost to tax payers to kill these dogs is through the roof. Unless there is a legitimate medical reason a dog cannot be spayed/neutered a very expensive license should be required to own an unaltered dog and if you are caught with an unaltered dog the fines should be severe.
Lola's Grandpa
3:55 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
I agree with Lola's Dad.
spongebrooke
5:45 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Why not go with a non-breed specific vicious dog law instead? Every owner regardless of breed should be held accountable for their dogs actions.
George Slefo
1:20 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Hey everyone -
Just a head's up, but there will be an update regarding this story tomorrow (Saturday) on Skokie Patch. Be sure to check it out!
Best,
George
Frank
11:49 am on Saturday, May 12, 2012
Yes, they can be very sweet dogs. A friend of mine has one....but I just don't trust the animal......
sherwin dubren
5:34 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I follow news stories about dog attacks reported in the newspapers. Why is it that almost all the time a pit bull is responsible? There could be pit bulls around that are
controlled adequately, but from a statistical point of view, I consider the pit bulls a dangerous breed, for whatever reason of their genetics or training. Certain dogs have been bred for specific tasks, like pointers for hunting. I'm afraid the pit bulls have a inbred trait for aggressiveness that could come out at any time. There are two new pit bulls living next to me. I didn't confront them or antagonize them, but they go crazy when I am out in my yard. I keep a can of spray handy in case their
owner forgets to close the gate to his yard.
Anna Riley
5:47 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
All dogs have the propensity to turn violent:
http://www.ucdenver.edu/about/newsroom/newsreleases/Pages/DogBiteConcern.aspx
According to the ATTS (American Temperament Test Society) the American Pit Bull has a better temperament than many many other breeds:
http://atts.org/breed-statistics/statistics-page1/
Additionally the pit bull was called the "nanny dog" in the United States for over 100 years:
http://www.ywgrossman.com/photoblog/?p=676
Breed bans do not work and every decade seems to have a dog breed it vilifies. German Shepherds, Dobermans, etc etc etc.
Not to mention the breed has its own share of heros:
http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/18178649/pit-bull-rescues-owner-from-trains-path
Breed bans do nothing but punish law abiding citizens like my family. We take good care of our animals, a rescue Pittie and GSD. The bad people who train dogs to fight will just find another breed to torture and maim to make them killers. To deter these people we need much harsher laws against animal cruelty and neglect. Punish the people who do the bad things not the people who love their animals.
My older son is autistic. He is severely developmentally delayed and may very likely end up in a group home as an adult. We specifically got a pit bull rescue dog *BECAUSE* of its temperament. This animal is very patient with my older son. Please do not want to take our son's friend away.
http://www.pitbulladvocate101.com/BSL.php
dave
9:43 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
I think to ban any animal because of there breed is wrong. I have 2 pitbull and a mut and when the pitbulls are playing and my mut thinks it is getting out of hand he jumps in the middle and separates them we also volunteer and rescue shelter with these breeds and they are all very loving. So to ban a dog for its breed is like saying they should ban or put down any human with gang tattos or colors because they could be a threat to society.