patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Update: Dold, Kirk Want Changes to Affordable Care Act, Schakowsky Praises Decision

Local politicians reacted Thursday to the Supreme Court's 5–4 decision to uphold President Obama's Affordable Care Act.

 

(Update at 2:15 p.m.) Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth) wants to make change to some parts of the Affordable Care Act and retain other provisions in the wake of today’s United States Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision to uphold the law.

“We need to put in place provisions we’ve talked about and repeal some of the others,” Dold said today. “I consider the doctor-patient relationship sacrosanct and nothing should come in between that.”

Among other things, Dold wants to get rid of the Independent Patient Advisory Board, a 15-member panel created by the Affordable Care Act charged with finding Medicare savings.

Dold wants to retain the provisions allowing people under 26 to remain on their parents’ coverage and those that prohibit an insurer from withholding coverage from a person because of a pre-existing medical condition. One of Dold’s biggest concerns is the cost of health care.

“I have seen health care costs for my employees rise over 44 percent in the last two years,” Dold said. “This bill fails to improve the quality of health care and it fails to reduce the cost of health care for the American people.”

Tomorrow Patch will have a story on the similarities and differences between Dold and his Democratic opponent in the Nov. 6 election, Deerfield management consultant Brad Schneider, on the Affordable Care Act.

(Earlier at 11:55) Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Highland Park) fears today’s United States Supreme Court decision upholding President Obama’s Affordable Care Act will threaten the country’s economic recovery, according to a statement issued by his office.

Kirk called for repeal of the law. He wants to replace it with reforms that will foster competition in the insurance industry and give people more options purchasing protection.

“The health care law threatens our economic recovery by raising taxes, imposing new regulations and creating a drag on the economy," Kirk said in the statement. "Congress (should) replace it with common sense, centrist reforms that give Americans the right to buy insurance across state lines and expand coverage without raising taxes.”

(Earlier: 10 a.m.) Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Evanston) called today historic with the decision of the United States Supreme Court to uphold the Affordable Care Act considering it the most significant law Congress has passed in the last 50 years.

“The law ends insurance industry abuses in the health system, improves Medicare and Medicaid for seniors and the disabled, and covers millions of uninsured Americans,” Schakowsky said in a prepared statement.

According to Schakowsky, more than 86 million Americans have already benefitted from the new law including 6.6 million people under 26 who can remain on their parents’ existing coverage. She thinks it should be a start not a finish.

“This positive decision by the nation’s highest court in the land should resolve any doubts that Congress can and should act to ensure that Americans get the health care they need at a price they can afford,” Schakowsky said. “It will allow us to move forward and maintain our commitment to real health care security.” 

The Court’s decision means when the law is fully in place in two more years, people can no longer be denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions. “No longer will families be bankrupt because someone gets sick,” Schakowsky said. “People with mental illness will get the care they need.” 

Patch will have comments from Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth) this afternoon. 

(Earlier: 9:27 a.m.) The United States Supreme Court voted 5-4 today to uphold President Barack Obama’s Affordable Health Care Act.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the Court’s liberal wing of Associate Justices Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor to uphold one of the President’s signature accomplishments.

This means all provisions of the law including the individual mandate requiring all Americans without health care to purchase it will take effect.

Patch will have an update later today with the reactions of Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Evanston) and Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth).

Related Topics: Health Care, Jan Schakowsky, President Obama, Robert Dold, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, affordable health care act, and obamacare

Gary

9:38 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The United States of America no longer exists under law. Good bye. It was a good ride.

President Obama, your loyal subjects await your next decree.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

11:38 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Based upon previous posts, it is my opinion that Sandra Sims appears to be a graduate of the Chicago public school system-she has difficulty reading, writing and thinking. A 3 word sentence with no verb-that's quite an improvement for Sims.

Keep working on it Ms. Sims-soon you will be able to actually express an intelligent thought.

Comment_arrow

Sandra Sims

1:17 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Another big drama queen, who probably holds forth for hours on end, with no one there but himself, just to hear the sound of his own voice and what he considers his pearls of wisdom. Then he comes on Patch and types it all out, hour after hour. The fact that rational people think he's a wingnut, just confirms his irrational wildly inflated opinion of himself. Also, he's a gasbag.

Comment_arrow

James Iverson

1:41 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Dear Sandra, you expressed that very well!

Billy Bob

9:46 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hey Gary, countries with truly socialized health care (which so-called Obamacare is decidely NOT) have better health outcomes and cost less per capita. Why do you oppose better care for less dollars? Is it because you don't want your fellow citizens to have access to health care? Nice country you would have this be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve Handwerker

10:45 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

OK, so, explain how I can afford this on a low income? HOW MUCH HIGHER WILL MY TAXES BE...because it seems that's how I'm going to be paying for my healthcare.

Comment_arrow

Ana Draa

1:55 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Billy Bob, we lived in such a country, Belgium, for 7 years. We had easy access to easy access to top level healthcare, everyone did. Yes, taxes are higher, but as a society, they've decided that much like education, it's important for everyone in their country (even us foreigners!) to have access to proper healthcare. It's stressfull enough to have a sick or injured love one, without the addess stress of wondering if you'll be able to access much needed care. When you go to the doctor there, there is no office staff, without a maze of insurance, none is needed...talk about cutting costs! I'm grateful that the Supreme Court has upheld the Affordable Healthcare Act...I'll take "Obamacare" over "Don't care" any day of the week.

Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

11:54 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

@Steve Handwerker
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

Johny

9:49 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

And silly me.... I thought Congress had something to do with it.

Reply

Jim

9:57 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Better outcomes? Not if you are sick. Where do you people get your BS?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Billy Bob

10:00 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Yes, better outcomes in total. Check out the stats. The U.S. ranks 37th in the world in the effectiveness of health care treatmentsmeasured by the outcomes of obtaining treatment. That can be your new chant: "We are #37!"

Comment_arrow

John Utah

11:50 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Billy Bob, the fact you honestly think the USA is 37th in outcomes is downright scary. Countries fib their statistics to the "global health institutes" in order to look better, and the global socialists put it out there so ignorant American leftists like yourself actually believe it.

Joe Nelson

10:01 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I was expecting to be dissapointed with the ruling. But how does Chief Justice Robert vote to let ObamaCare stand and he was the deciding vote. Let's all hope that the Congress can get it repealed with Romney as President; if not it's the end of The United States of America as we know it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

11:55 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

@Joe Nelson

Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

J

10:03 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Congrats! It's a stepping stone to a bigger and better plan for all.

Reply

Mary Dalton

10:04 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Billy Bob, if you're talking about countries like Italy, France, Spain, Greece, etc., they can't afford those expensive programs any longer. We have a lousy healthcare system, yes, but socialized medicine is not the answer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Billy Bob

10:19 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Actually, of those countries, only Greece has a public-generated debt problem (the others suffer from too much private debt--housing bubble sorts of thing--for which the governments are being asked to bail out private banks and which have caused downturns in the econonmies, leading to lower tax receipts). And a huge contributing factor is Greece's issue is their failure to actually collect the taxes they impose. None of those countries find their health care unaffordable or something they will no longer support. Quite the contrary. By the way, look at the Scandinavian countries for a real model!

Comment_arrow

David Harold

1:01 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mary you need to listen more than you speak, if you know excatly and specifically what your talking about then you must be a phsyci and/or a genius. The details arent even on the table yet and you like all the other so called "well informed" people will keep this country right where it presently is??!!

Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

11:56 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Seems to be working out pretty well in Canada...

Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

Carol Kraines

10:06 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

My faith in humanity and the political process is restored! Americans now will have more health security than they have ever had before. This is a great day.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

11:52 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

So what happens when doctors go John Galt on us? Who will perform your operation in a timely matter? The US government can't force people to become doctors if the supply drops. At least not how it was founded.....

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

10:54 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Actually, most of us control our own health destiny-try exercising every day and eating right.

Yesterday, a friend of mine celebrated his 70th birthday. He could easily pass for 55 and mentally he's as sharp as a tack. He burns about 5,000 calories daily exercising and he eats whatever he wants, including desert.

Get off your rear end and walk. That's the way to cut health care costs in America. Cost: $0.

Anne

10:20 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

We're doomed! The majority of Americans did not want this. Obama has shown over and over he does not care what WE want! Vote Him Out!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug Purington

11:25 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Doomed? Yes, if Romney gets in....which he won't!

Comment_arrow

Ana Draa

1:57 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Wrong Anne....the majority of Americans do want affordable healthcare.

Comment_arrow

Anne

2:33 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Wrong, Ana Draa...
The majority of American's do NOT want to be forced to buy anything...especially, by the government. Everyone has health care. You cannot be turned away from the ER. Everyone does NOT have insurance. That is what this is about and forcing people to 'buy' it will not force people to use it.

Comment_arrow

Nick

5:57 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Anne your wrong! Most people do want health care! We just want to stop the freeloaders from using the emergency room for free! Tons of people who can afford healthcare, but choose to spend their money differently. These people are the first to run to the emergency room and pass the buck onto all of us.

Comment_arrow

Mara Meyer

7:35 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Ann, you are wrong. There is no provision to fine anyone who does not have healthcare. What this does is send a message to the insurance industry to tighten up your act and price it accordingly. This will open the door to those who can now choose which provider they wish for their healthcare. No longer will Congressioonal Representatives and Senators need to be influenced to friend those companies that have greased the wheel of the REps and Senators.
It will be the first time THE PEOPLE will have a choice! Also companies can stop not taking advantage of the tax credits offered when they offer employees Health benefits.

WAKE UP!

Comment_arrow

Pat

9:49 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Amen! Too many people are drinking the Obama kool-aid and by the time they realize what he is doing to this country it will be too late. Have any of you considered all of the illegals that will now have full coverage? Who is paying for that? Check your insurance rates and watch how they contunue to rise. Need surgery? Stand in the long line just like Canada, why do you think they are coming to the US for surgery.

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

10:56 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Yes, the majority of Americans want something for nothing. Who doesn't? Unfortunately, there is no free lunch. Somebody got to pay the lunch bill.

Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

11:57 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

Matt Smith

10:22 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

This isn't socialized healthcare at all. Ask your Republician Congressmen and Senators about THEIR healthcare. It's called single payer. If single payer is good enough for Congress, it should be good enough for ALL Americans. Don't be duped by right wing and Fox News talking points. This will improve our healthcare system.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

11:54 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Don't be duped by the socialist/fascist left wing and MSNBC talking points. This will not improve our healthcare system.

Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

11:58 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ John Utah
I think you might be missinformed about what ObamaCare really is. Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

Matt Smith

10:24 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Anne, you're wrong. Only Republicans didn't want this because it came during the Obama Presidency. I'm still waiting to hear Republicans explain how it was ok for Romney to do this in Massachusetts, but not okay for the rest of the country. Hmmm

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Jones

11:13 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Matt, you are the one that is wrong. This will now open the floodgates of what the government will control which is every single part of your life, your families lives, your neighbors...etc. Once they say its "Ok" to force someone to purchase healthcare, they will start on every other aspect as well. You wont be able to buy what you want anylonger unless they give it the ok. Examples: your 32 oz of soda. Yes, I know its bad for me, I choose myself not to drink that amount. But on the very rare occasion I may get one, it may last me the entire day to drink as well. But its MY choice to do so. The government needs to stay out. Another example; you wont be able to choose what to give your child for a lunch for school. You will instead have to purchase one of the school's lunches (this is already happening out there). I can easily see the government just saying no to home-schooling as well in the very near future. They want our kids to be indoctrinated to their socialist beliefs. These are all my opinions of course, just like you gave yours. I've seen all these things coming for a long time. Just wait, you'll see it too.

Comment_arrow

Anne

2:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Matt, I am a registered Democrat. This healthcare act is full of holes. It's not okay regardless of your political standing. Options are great, but even my many doctor friends are not in favor of this.

Comment_arrow

Mara Meyer

7:37 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hey Matt - apparently the Justices used the information regarding the Massachusetts plan to form their position. I guesss Romney is flip-flopping again!

Ed60062

10:28 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Another nail in the coffin. With nearly anyone able to get free or subsidized housing, food, and healthcare, more and more people will decide to accept the nanny state handouts and refuse to work for a living.

Reply

Steve Handwerker

10:50 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Ahhhhhh, got to love public discourse! If only all of this great debate (I mean that sincerely and seriously, my fellow Patch readers) could have been a greater part of the process. I know some readers will say, "the public has had its say all along, but many people did not speak up," etc., and I will agree with you and only add that our legislators still do what they want to do and what special interest groups want. We all know that's true. Yes, we can choose to not reelect them, but undoing what is done is not so easy.

Reply

John

11:08 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Wonder how all of this is going to be paid for?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

11:59 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

grandpa

11:13 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Welcome to the Brave New World Prol!

Reply

Gary

11:26 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Let me be more specific.

The United States of America as a Constitutional Republic died today.

Now this is not a great shock. The country had been poisoned since 1913 when the Fed was introduced, and the fatal blow to the Constitution actually landed in 1935 when Social Security was passed. It just took 77 years for the Constitution to be declared officially dead.

This morning we finally witnessed the end of Constitutional law in the US. It's official, there are no longer any legal restraints on what the federal government can do for you, or, more importantly, what the federal government can do TO YOU.

What do we have left? We have a Republic, with no constraints on the federal government. That means 51% of the population can do whatever they want to the 49%, and the 49% have no legal recourse to protect themselves from abuse. The courts will not protect the minority from the majority. That was the role of the Constitution... and it's gone now. Perhaps everyone will understand it better if I say the 99% can do whatever it wants to the 1%.

You should all read up on the concept of "the tyranny of the majority".

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

11:56 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Well said Gary. I'm 28 and shutter to think where my lifespan is going....

Comment_arrow

Deadcatbounce

12:08 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Again, the constitution stops where the Internal Revenue Code begins

Comment_arrow

Gary

12:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

John,
We both know what your life is going to be like when you reach my age... and on behalf of my generation, and for what it's worth, I apologize.

We let this happen. We let leftists take over the schools in the late 60's and early 70's, and we did nothing to stop it. We let them stop teaching the benefits of free markets and limited government, or the dangers of centralized power, and let them continue their "Long March Through the Institutions of America" by teaching cultural relativism and the beneficence of the State.

It our fault. It's my fault. I saw all this happening over 25 years ago and convinced myself that someone else would pick up the ball. No one did. I waited until it was too late to get off my ass... we all waited too long. Shame on us.

The reward for our apathy will be a tremendous amount of suffering for an extended period of time. We have consigned your generation to one of servitude. I'm getting sick thinking about it.

Find a safe place and lock up a copy of the Federalist Papers, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution. When everyone has had enough pain they might be willing to listen to the message again.

Comment_arrow

Sandra Sims

6:56 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

You "shutter" to think? 28? Serioiusly, go back and retake 6th grade Englsh.

Comment_arrow

John Utah

8:23 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

@Sandra - how smug elitist of you to rip me. Did that feel good? Maybe next time you'll spell seriously right....

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

10:58 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Gary, pardon me, but I disagee. The November election will determine whether or not Obamacare stands.

Comment_arrow

RB

1:38 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Rich, the November election won't determine if it stands. Even if Willard wins, there is no chance of overturning. Fortunate.
Willard said the White House was not sleeping well. My guess is he's pulled the Ambian out. As Governor he implemented an almost identical healthcare plan and people like it. Doctors, hospitals, patients. Over 98% insured. The Heritage Society was for the individual mandate. A few sound bites at the right time and even Sheldon's Foreign Sands Casino money can't overcome the irony. Same old politics from the Republicans. Show trials, NRA score card and all.... Bunch of flatulent old men.

Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

11:59 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

Pat Craig

11:33 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The power to tax is the power to destroy. Daniel Webster (1782–1852)

More "free" stuff is now the law of the land.

The SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program)/Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever.

Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to "Please Do Not Feed The Animals." They say that this is because the animals may grow dependent on handouts and not learn to take care for themselves.

"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."
---Thomas Jefferson

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deadcatbounce

12:06 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

perfect example that the constitution stops where the Internal Revenue Code begins

Comment_arrow

Roxanne Conway

12:00 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm

It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.

RB

11:54 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

So many right wing, tea Bagger, fake conservative, sky is falling people on this board were on the wrong side of history! President Obama passed legislation that was clearly upheld by SCOTUS. Mr. Romney is a prisoner of Grover Norquist and the religious right, the NRA, and other right wing groups that the sell out he's made can't allow him to make sensible decisions. Basically, at the core he might be a good guy, but he can't be. Now, we have a SCOTUS decision that makes Obama the man with the wind at his back....healthcare, fair immigration for young people, gay marriage, saving The Auto Industry....on and on. Now the Eric Holder contempt side show will look like more politics from the party of no.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

12:00 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Obama won the legal battle. The political battle is just starting RB....

Comment_arrow

Gary

12:06 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

You now live in a world where the 51% can do anything they want to the 49%. You might want to consider what might happen to you when YOU find yourself in the 49%.

You're going to be out there exhuming the Constitution, and waving it in our faces... but it's dead now. The Supreme Court has ruled, precedence has been set, and it can't be undone for at least a generation. There are no protections for anyone.

WE can now do anything we want to YOU when we win. Lefties never consider that possibility when they grant themselves unlimited power to re-engineer society. It's a blind spot.

David Harold

1:08 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Why do think congress isn't able to come to any agreement on anything ? hmmm it wouldn't be prejudice now would it!

Reply

Marlena Jayatilake

1:09 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

What we fail to understand is that all Americans will have access to affordable healthcare and will pay a monthly premium. Additionally and historically speaking.....for the 1st time illegal aliens will NOT have access to this insurance. For those who insist that our economy will take a hit, how much money do you think this country will save by not covering millions of illegal aliens??? Take the time to read the new health care law before you pass judgment. You may find that you like it and if you decide you hate it at least YOU will have the facts for YOURSELF. Good Job Mr. President!

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

2:30 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Haha, good try Marlena. Illegals will still just walk into the ER and get treatment.

Jim

1:24 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I am going to spend most of my time trying to get folks who work to pay for all of my goodies. Then I will vote for the politicians who promise me even more. Boy! this is great. Free stuff at someone else's expense. I am sure that all of the doctors are going to worl long hours and weekends for little or no pay to serve the needs of The Messiah Obama particularly when they will be sued not less often but more often. This is great.

Reply

Jim

1:26 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

And Schackowsky's opinion is worthless. She never met a government program or tax she didn't like.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sandra Sims

6:57 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Seems to me Kirk has been taking full advantage of his taxpayer funded gubmint health care lo these many months.....

Comment_arrow

Pat

8:26 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

She is just a rubber stamp for the community organizer, that only voted 'present' on every vote when he was a Senator in IL. Cook County and the State of IL are forcing businesses and people out of our state due to politicians like the Pres, Jan Schackowsky, Madigan, Stroger, etc. We are killing the small businesses that made this country.

RB

1:33 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

So much of the rattle coming out of the right wing has to do whether something is constitutional or not. Gun Rights etc. Well, the AFCA was just ruled Constitutional! So, move on. Stop Whining about the past, this country has a future for everyone if the party of no will start allowing Congress to start igoverning again. Judicial review is the ultimate and final decision. Cry all you want. It's a good bill, it's the right time for it. Is it perfect? No. Improve upon it, don't waste time trying to gut it. Start making jobs and improving the economy. Stop the whining and govern about what we need. Ideology enforcement is so yesterday.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.Lyn

8:25 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

RB... the rattle you hear is the death rattle of a dying breed... LoL

Pat Craig

1:49 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

Frederic Bastiat

Reply

Gary

2:28 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Upon further review....

... this is far worse than I thought it was.

The Supreme Court ruled today that Congress can pass a law telling people how to behave, and that Congress can levy a penalty on anyone who doesn't comply as long as the penalty is called a tax.

In one fell swoop the US Constitutional has been thrown out the window and the Supreme Court has handed Congress a road map on how to oppress the people with the full blessing of the Supreme Court.

Our government has been instantaneously dissolved and replaced with tyranny. We are now a Banana Republic.

And it all hinged on the decision of one man, Justice John Roberts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

2:55 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Decaf after noon!
Oh, the sky is falling!
Seriously, the past 2 years of flatulence by the Republican party is getting old. Pass a jobs bill (which the President has sent up), how about helping instead of whining all the time. Suddenly something is ruled constitutional and the sky is falling. Isn't that your biggest gripe? Whether something is constitutional? Well, the Affordable Care Act is, so be happy Tea Bagger, it's Constitutional!!!!

Comment_arrow

John Utah

3:16 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Tea Bagger? Real classy. Hey all you independents reading these comments and not commenting.....there's the left for you.

RB thinks if the US Congress passes a "Jobs Bill", that unemployment will magically go down. He thinks Congress can just create permanent, long term jobs by saying so on paper. And that it all will be free! Nothing added to the debt, no more money printed for inflation.

Comment_arrow

Doug Daluga

9:38 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

U.S. Constitution, article 1, section 8 - "The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States."
How has the Constitution been "thrown out the window"?

Comment_arrow

Gary

12:17 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

The Supreme Court just ruled that Congress can pass a law mandating that an individual has to behave a certain way, or face a penalty - oops - face a tax.

You tell me what's left of the constitution. What conceivable limit is there on federal power with this kind of precedence on the books? Nothing.

I am not overreacting here. I really don't see how anything is left of the constitution after this. For extra credit you can tell me all the ways Congress could abuse this new power to punish political enemies.

Jim

2:49 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

1. Irreversible damage to constitutional government.

2. Costs will go up.

3. Quality will go down.

4. Shortage of doctors.

5. more non-hiring.

6. same old same old with malpractice, if anything worse.

7. The patients will be hurt the worst but for the most part won't know it

8. The rich will be OK because there will be a cadre of doctors who will cater to them.

9. congress will be emboldened to "tax".

10. overall, the medical "system will not be fixed.

11. As far as radoiology is concerned, more consolidation of groups, less reimbursement and fewer radiologists hired.

Overall, not good.

Jim

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

2:59 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

According to faux news?

Young people on health insurance, pre existing illness covered, increased competition, tort reform, no caps......and a small tax without penalty. Humanity to healthcare. Not such a bad thing. Heck, Romney had the idea! There's plenty of healthcare availability, it will now be affordable. This will be tweaked and improved even more. Many major Acts evolved.

Comment_arrow

John Utah

3:11 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Thanks RB for the Matthews/Maddow/Schultz/ODonnell viewpoint....

Can you explain how the "affordability" of medical insurance makes the cost of an MRI go down? Or the price per night in a hospital? Or the latex gloves the doctor uses?

Pure mindlessness on display today for the ignorant North Shore liberals...

Comment_arrow

RB

3:36 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

John, perhaps you should ask that question of someone without health insurance. Today, they pay full retail rack rate for a night in the hospital. The AFFORDABLE care act brings costs to the level that everyone with insurance pays. A hospital charges much more than necessary because they have to write off so much for people without healthcare insurance. Do you think your homeowners insurance is insuring just your home, at the affordable rate you pay? You are the mindless one. And, the affordable care act is constitutional!

Comment_arrow

RB

3:39 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Your man Romney did all this already in Mass. They survived and love the system. Mandate, Tax, penalty the whole Thing. Romney, father of Obamacare.

Comment_arrow

John Utah

4:22 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

RB, by your reasoning, hospitals in the North Shore should have amazing rates! Since probably 95% at least attending have medical insurance! Why are they so high?

Insurance for auto/home/life are affordable because market forces are involved. I go out and shop for the best deal at the coverage I want. Should be no different in health care. Nobody has a "right" to health care, since it requires someone else mutually and freely providing the service.

Comment_arrow

dmz

7:33 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Keep spewing your right wing talking points.....read the constitution.....you might learn something.

Comment_arrow

John Utah

9:54 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

DMZ, right back at you slick....

John Utah

2:51 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Justice Roberts: "The federal government does not have the power to order people to buy health insurance. ... The federal government does have the power to impose a tax on those without health insurance."

Future Congress Law:

"We have the power to impose a tax on those without gym memberships......a proven balanced diet.....energy efficient windows.....solar panel roof......INSERT LEFTIST DREAM ISSUE OF THE DAY...."

You mindless liberals cheering this have no idea what's in store. Hope you are older and not young like me. When the USA is no longer, what happens to the rest of the world?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mara Meyer

9:59 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

So I guess those states that require auto insurance don't have to anymore, right?

Ana Draa

3:22 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

John, I'll explain how. As we move towards a single payer model (although we're not nearly there yet), the need for doctors to have staff that does nothing but work insurance claims goes away. Ditto with the hospital, the process of getting paid gets a lot more simple, hence less folks needed to do the work, lower costs. I've lived under a very successful socialized medicine system, used it a lot....it works quite well. When you go to the hospital in Belgium, the first procedure you have is not a "wallet biopsy", as it is in every American hospital. People there get sick, get hurt and get care. As a society, they've made the decision to make sure everyone has access to care, as a basic right. We can do better, we must do better.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Millie

3:58 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Ana you comparing Belgium with a population of around 10 million to the USA with a population of about 325 million. And saying it will run very smoothly

Comment_arrow

John Utah

4:14 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

More mindless drivel. Single player in the USA will be the END OF GLOBAL HEALTHCARE AS WE KNOW IT. Long wait times, rationed care, poor service, shorter life spans. WE are the failsafe for the failed European models. Once we join them, IT'S OVER. See James comment about 325 million and growing people. Not to mention far as the eye can see trillion dollar deficits until everything collapses.

You leftists think you're so smart, but you have no idea....

Comment_arrow

RB

4:44 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Romneycare. You keep getting the name wrong. He suddenly has decided mandates are bad. Well, they are constitutional! (I love saying that). 3 minutes after the decision he's out there speaking against his own ideas! It's interesting how Mr. flip flop Willard Mitt no longer supports Romneycare. Heritage Foundation no longer supports mandates. They came up with the idea! Another thing, why would Willard Mitt insist that immigrants only gain legal status by serving in the armed services when he avoided service? Yep, several deferments later, he missed serving in Vietnam. Instead of fighting in the trenches, he was evangelizing in France under a 'minister' deferment. So, much of this spineless stuff about Willard is going to overwhelm any hope he has of winning. Mr. flip flip, off shore, out sourcing Willard, cowardly man of the people! Ha ha.

Comment_arrow

Larry Stephens

4:55 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Looks like our country is moving back to the HMOs. They didn't work the first time. But, maybe forcing it on taxpayers will do the trick the second time around.

Comment_arrow

Ana Draa

10:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

James, you are correct, Belgium has a population of approximately 10 million. France 65 million, Germany 81 million. Add them up, their total population is approximately half of the US. And all of these countries have single payer healthcare done very well. Here's another interesting fact, they include everyone in their country, and do so using only 10% of the GDP, compared to our system, which uses 17% percent of GDP, leaves out millions and has average outcomes. We can do better!

There are so many heartbreaking stories about American families being destroyed by healthcare debts. I have a friend in Houston who was in a motorcycle accident, suffered a tramatic brain injury. She had healthcare, went through the 1 million dollar lifetime maximum very quickly. Then her husband had to look for another source of insurance. In order to qualify for medicaid, they had to go through all of their hard earned assets, loss everything, so they could qualify. Yes, she now has her care paid for again, and they are in their late 50's, stripped of their assets and she'll never be albe to work again. It's a common horror story of what happens with catastrophic health bills in our system. Under The Affordable Care Act, lifetime limits go away, thank goodness!

I am so glad that President Obama is trying. Imgaine how much further he would get if all of congress and the senate would honor their commitments, work with him rather than purposely work for Obama's personal failure.

Comment_arrow

steve reinglass

11:24 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The European Union has socialized care but many have two tier systems. A private system in conjunction with a government system. Also, Europeans are less litigious.
The trial attorneys are supported by the democrats and no tort reform is in the works. Without tort reform, healthcare reform is worthless. Europeans feel healthcare is a right, pensions are a right , early retirement is a basic right and thats why the European Union is going bankrupt. Someone has to pay the piper.!!!!

dmz

3:59 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The audacity of Kirk, who is receiving the BEST healthcare the government can provide, to want to deny the rest of the country the same level of care he is receiving.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

4:45 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Watch how Mr. "moderate" Dold votes.

Comment_arrow

dmz

5:29 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mr. Dold is no moderate....he'll be gone in January.

Comment_arrow

Mara Meyer

10:01 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

And as for the DOLD comment - from your mouth...!

Tom Peters

4:02 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

For those of you who thought today was a red letter day for America with this ruling then I have a Bridge in brooklyn to sell you. Taxagedon is around the corner. 33 new taxes are scheduled for Jan 1st and another 40 plus in 2014 to play for a plan the Supreme Court ruled as constitional because "they" consider it a tax and the government has a right to enoforce taxes on it's citizens. The Dems sold it as a "right" not a tax so they lied to us. What a surprise. I believe in helping the helpless not the clueless. What's next, the SC will legislate us out of drinking 44 0z soft drinks...sorry our government is already working on that. Oh, one last thing...when was the last time the government added any new program that was cost effective or efficient? Don't think too hard or long on that one.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

4:46 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

3 wars, recession and Bush cut taxes. Gotta pay for something sometime.

Comment_arrow

dmz

5:30 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Iraq, Afghanistan, Medicare Part D. two Bush tax cuts.....were all unpaid for....The ACA is paid for...now that's being responsible.

Comment_arrow

Mara Meyer

10:03 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

If you can get the mindless out of Congress perhaps we coud be more effective!

Larry Stephens

4:51 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I wonder if Pelosi knows what is in the bill now.
"We have to pass it to find out what is in it." - Nancy Pelosi

Reply

Pat Craig

4:56 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Beware the law of unintended consequences. SCOTUS ruled that States do not have to expand Medicaid.

Americans with low incomes who do not qualify for Medicaid under their states' policies may now be squeezed by the health law's requirement that every individual purchase healthcare coverage or face a penalty.

It means lots of folks will be caught in between the mandate to have insurance and the fact they may not be able to afford it,

Illinois is currently bankrupt. How can we be expected to fund any additional Medicaid coverages? Where will the money come from?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mara Meyer

10:05 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Maybe those who will be out of insurance coverage, due to the changes enacted in Illinois, as of Sunday will once again find affordable coverage!

Comment_arrow

steve reinglass

11:28 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

That's true. Medicaid cannot be the instrument for universal health care, It is supported by state government and is run horrendously. As a physician I stopped taking medicaid because of government non payment. All we hear is that Illinois has no money and services cannot be paid. So what doctor will take Medicaid. The premise is completely flawed and will fall apart. THe poor will have an insurance no
doctor will accept.

Dan Pritzker

5:40 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

This is a great day for the USA. THANK YOU Justice Roberts. Now most everyone will have health care. I laugh when tea baggers say they will overturn it. First off, billions have been spent already. Second the tea baggers would need The White House, House and 60+ Senators to override a filibuster. That won't happen. No President would remove 35 million people from health insurance. Could you imagine Grandma with cancer not allowed to finish her chemo? Makes for great TV huh? Thank you Obama and God!

Reply

Dan Pritzker

5:43 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

One more thing, there is no penalty if you refuse to purchase insurance. Do your research! There is no penalty! What nut wouldn't want health insurance except for the flat earther tea baggers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Millie

6:11 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Dan you are incorrect. You will be fined if you don't buy insurance. You just don't have to pay the fine and there is no penalty for not paying fine

Comment_arrow

J.Lyn

8:44 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

James...therefore...there is no fine.

Comment_arrow

LaVerne

7:36 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Yup J.Lyn and there fore nothing is chaned your health insurance will go up to pay for uninsured

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

1:02 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Mr. Pritzker, could you please tell all of us what a "tea bagger" is? You need to have your mouth washed out with soap.

RB

6:10 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Dold just sent an email out calling Affordable care a new tax. So, you can see where his 'moderate' stance is going the way Cantor wants...bye bye. A new tax? We are already taxed by paying higher healthcare costs each time the uninsured gets care and does not pay. With AFCA, they either get insurance or THEY pay the tax instead of us. It's so simple and the right thing to do. 1% of the people may have to pay because they refuse to get insurance. Why should that decision be on our backs? Make them pay a penalty!

Reply

Scott Nelson

6:59 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I am enjoying watching the GOP squirm. Dan you are so right, there is no way it will be overturned. People actually think it will be. Most just don't know what this bill includes. When they find out they wonder why the Dems didn't go farther. Great day for America. I hope Joe Lieberman gets hit by a bus.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

7:26 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The GOP is coming up with some really hairbrained ideas but still have no plan how to replace this coverage when they try to repeal this Act. This was a historic day, brought peace of mind to people denied healthcare, needing coverage for sick children, small business will be able to provide healthcare for employees and on and on. Did you see the Texas GOP platform? It just came out today..."We urge Congress to repeal government sponsored programs that deal with early childhood development". That's the kind of thinking we are up against. Dumbing of America and it won't work. This was a good day and....it is CONSTITUTIONAL!

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

12:23 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Scott Nelson: "I hope Joe Lieberman gets hit by a bus."

What kind of person is anyone who would say such a thing?

mb

7:01 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Health care expenditures in the United States represent 18 percent of GDP. If you think Obama and the Dems passed this for "The People," then you are stunningly misinformed. Romney ... Obama ... there's no difference except who's in their pockets, and it's called, "business as usual." 18 percent of GDP is BIG business.

Reply

Jim

7:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Scott,

While I am not as nasty and viscious as you libs are ,I wonder if you will squirm when you are hit by a bus and lose your insurance card. "I am so sorry, sir. I will not be able to take care of you without your card. Please limp back to the scene to see if you can find it".

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

7:51 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

What you're complaining about makes no sense. People carry insurance cards today. If you happen to not have it with you, things get worked out. I've seen nothing requiring a card in your hand before they would give you care. also, there is no provision to turn away someone without insurance. There is a provision to tax them $95 first year so that they will get insurance like anyone with brains would do.

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

4:43 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

RB, what happens if you can't afford to pay the $95? If you can't afford the $95, you can't afford to buy health care insurance either.

President Fidel Obama, I mean President Barack Castro, has sunk the economy. I didn't move to Florida for the sunshine. I moved to Florida to find work. I know people who have been out of work for 2 years and longer. They can't afford to buy food-do you really think that, if you can't afford to buy food becaue Obamacare wrecked the American economy, they are going to pay the tax for not having health insurance?

Obamacare destroyed the American economy. What good is health care insurance if you can't afford to buy food or afford the rent for shelter?

Something tells me you've got a job-probably a government job-and you're asking yourself: recession, what recession? Yes, RB, 46 million Americans are receiving food stamps because they don't have enough money to buy food. In the America that I knew before President Fidel Obama assumed office, anybody who wanted a job could get a job and buying food and paying rent wasn't an issue.

Since President Fidel Obama was elected in 2008, all of that has changed. Why?

The answer to that question is that there is no difference between Castro, Chavez and Obama.

Marlene Robin

7:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mark Kirk should be ashamed of himself for commenting when the taxpayers are paying for his insurance. When given the choice between using the Veterans Hospital and a tony north shore hospital, he chose the latter for his care. How dare he speak against Obamacare when he is covered by and large by taxpayers who don't have the same luxury of choice as he did. He has no sensitivity towards anyone else but himself, true to the ideology of his party. Shame on you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

LaVerne

7:35 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

I have a choice of doctors. The doctor has to be on Staff at a hospital. You just can't say I e that Hospital better lets go their

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

4:45 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Last time I checked, Senator Kirk was an American citizen. To quote Hillary Clinton, "We are Americans and we have a right to debate." Since Senator Kirk is an American citizen, it would seem that he can express his opinion on Obamacare too, at least according to Hillary Clinton.

RB

8:01 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Representative Dold just sent a survey out asking if the new tax on American's is sound policy?
Here's my answer
Mr Dold, Your survey was a loaded question. The 'tax' is only on those people who make a choice not to purchase the mandated healthcare insurance. Your question makes it sound like everyone is going to pay a new tax. Instead, those of us getting healthcare will not be paying for those who don't have insurance. Your survey was a political stunt.

Reply

RB

8:14 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Let's recap. The President and Congress passed a rather conservative healthcare bill. They modeled it after the 1993 Republican mandated insurance plan. That plan was implemented by Romney in one State. Once started the Democrats found that the Republicans were no longer interested in a healthcare bill. A badly needed healthcare bill to solve huge problems. So, the Democrats still got it done.
Then, the Republicans decided to appeal through the courts and hopefully get to the Supreme Court. A very conservative Supreme Court. Guess what? They upheld the Act as Constitutional. So despite the Republican attempts to not pass what they once wanted, the Democrats were able to get it done. Now, when someone does not want to get health insurance, they get taxed. We should not have to pickup the bill for their care like we do now. Whats wrong with that? It's Constitutional!

Reply

Marlena Jayatilake

8:27 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

John Utah....I'm not trying to be right or wrong. I'm just saying maybe we should all read the law to better understand it so that we can make INFORMED statements. Although illegals can walk right into the emergency room, it is not insurance. There are some things I like in the reform and certainly some things I disagree with. Overall, I think it helps more than it hurts.........but that is my opinion. Thank you for the very useful debate, its what makes us so great as a nation!

Reply

RB

8:48 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

John Utah "More mindless drivel. Single player in the USA will be the END OF GLOBAL HEALTHCARE AS WE KNOW IT. Long wait times, rationed care, poor service, shorter life spans"
News for you. The US is rated 6th in quality of care and we currently pay twice per capita what many other civilized countries pay. Sweden, Netherlands as examples. AND we have 50 million uninsured. They have fully insured. Our life span is shorter than theirs. Our system needs to be fixed. The Republican solution is to do away with Medicare and that's what's working. Romney implemented low cost subsidized insurance once before, but Republicans ignore that. Now, he wants to repeal ACA. Why, when 98% are insured in Mass.? 98%! Doctors and patients like it. Republicans are spending $250,000,000 to fight the ACA law. This law is a victory, a reform of a broken system. It's Constitutional too!

Reply

LaVerne

7:39 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Wont tis free up more doctors and hospital space. Those that don'y buy insurance get no healthcare service

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

8:24 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

No Lucas, the uninsured will just pay a tax and still walk in the ER for free....

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

12:43 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

No, there won't be any doctors to treat you, so it won't really matter if you have insurance or not. . . . that's cool-we'll all be equal then.

The Q

7:42 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Tax and Spend...........now they tax you for doing nothing.

Reply

Life is Good

7:56 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

"that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." "Abraham Lincoln, 1863."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

12:40 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Hmmmm. . . . the majority of Americans ("We the people") oppose Obamare.

Let's put Obamacare to a vote. . . . .if you support Obamacare, vote for the Democrats on election day; if you oppose Obamacare, vote for Republicans on election day. Pretty damn simple.

Ellen Beth Gill

10:32 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

I'm going to guess that the statement from Kirk was not exactly from Kirk, but his staff and some large donors who have taken over his office. That being said, I am also going to guess that Kirk would not disagree. He got up in front of the district in the summer of 2008 and said that nobody (at least nobody who mattered) was uninsured.

Reply

Richard Schulte

12:34 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Divorce (as an alternative to civil war) is looking better and better with each passing day. The election of 2012 is looking a lot like the election of 1860.

Secession, as an alternative to civil war, might not be such a bad idea. Divide up the country between the red and blue states and let the purple states vote on whether they prefer the red or blue nation.

Instead of the Confederate States of America (CSA), the new (red) nation could be called the Constitutional States of America (CSA). The other nation (the blue nation) could be called New Greece and the capitol of New Greece could be located in Detroit. Detroit would be the perfect capitol city for the blue nation.

Of course, the currency of the blue nation (New Greece) would feature a picture of Barack Obama on the front and a picture of downtown Detroit on the back. You could win a poker game with a picture of Barack Obama and downtown Detroit-two of a kind.

Reply

Richard Schulte

12:35 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

From the internet: You know the honeymoon is over,when the comedians start.

"The liberals are asking us to give Obama time. We agree...and think 25 to life would be appropriate." --Jay Leno

Reply

Richard Schulte

12:37 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

"Instead, even as he cast a powerful vote to rein in the Commerce Clause as our Founding Fathers intended for it to be applied against federal intrusiveness, Chief Justice Roberts returned Obamacare front-and-center back into the November elections debate. Defining it for what it really is -- a new, enormous federal tax on at least four million Americans (Slip op. at 37) -- the Chief Justice has lobbed a fat hanging curveball for conservatives to clobber. The ObamaCare tax does not apply to those who presently are untaxed, and it will not apply to the more wealthy, who will be excused because they carry health insurance anyway. Rather, the President who promised no new taxes against the middle class conclusively has been "outed" by the Chief Justice as having imposed the biggest tax on middle-class Americans in a generation."

Read more:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/the_chief_justice_done_good.html#ixzz1zBzdoqB5

Thumbs up Chief Justice Roberts!!!

The Dems got their butts kicked yesterday and they haven't figured it out yet. Oh well, by election day it will be obvious that the Chief Justice did good for America.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

1:49 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Rich, once again your mind is wandering. Like it did when you so boldly predicted the court would overturn. This was a clear win for Mr. Obama and The American People. As far as the new Tax,that's nothing other than Faux news talking points. If someone chooses not to buy insurance, they should pay a tax. Someday they will need healthcare and we should not have to pay for it as we do today. It's a major fix to a broken system, but you don't see that with the blinders on. Romney saw it, and the Heritage Foundation saw it too. They just changed their mind when Mr. Obama finally got it done, and it's constitutional!

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

4:27 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

RB, the basis for the Obamacare decision came out of left field somewheres. Hard to predict outliers.

Note that conservatives correctly predicted the results of Wisconsin recall election of Governor Walker. Perhaps our accuracy in predicting Supreme Court decision is not so great, but we call the important stuff, like elections, correctly.

The 2012 election will follow the 2010 election model-landslide Republican victory. The TEA party produced the 2010 landslide and will produce the 2012 landslide.

Stopping the implementation of Obamacare is relatively easy-President Romney will follow President Obama lead and just ignore the law. President Obama set the precedent of ignoring legally mandated laws and Romney will follow Obama's precedent.

Be careful of what you wish for-you just might get it.

Comment_arrow

Rusty Shackleford

3:41 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

"Instead, even as he cast a powerful vote to rein in the Commerce Clause as our Founding Fathers intended for it to be applied against federal intrusiveness, Chief Justice Roberts returned Obamacare front-and-center back into the November elections debate. Defining it for what it really is -- a new, enormous federal tax on at least four million Americans"

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/the_chief_justice_done_good.html#ixzz1zDVBWWXh
===============================================
absolutely agree.

A lot of people, my wife and a list of others I know, had fallen asleep about all this OboboCare.
After the SCOTUS ruling my wife started finally reading about the law, as did about half of those others, and all of them are PISSED now that they are beginning to understand what they should have known 18 months ago.

My wife wasnt even going to bother to vote this year but thanks to Justice Roberts and keeping ObozoCare alive and exposing that it IS a tax (hello...tied into IRS....TAX....get it?) and she sees how it works more clearly she's voting like I am.....for ANYONE BUT Obama....

Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

5:03 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

This is an excellent article on the American Thinker website. Chief Justice Roberts did an excellent job of framing the Obamacare issue for the 2012 election. To paraphrase James Carville, it's Obamacare, stupid.

The S.S. Obama just hit another iceberg and in 4 months will be joining the Titanic at the bottom of the ocean.

Rusty Shackleford

3:29 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

This was hardly a win for Obama.
Had they left it at not being a 'tax' it very certainly WOULD have been...except for the fact that we can repeal pretty much any law and that is exactly what will happen once the elections take place and we get these liberal nuts out of DC.

Making it a tax puts one more nail in the administrations hopes for reelection.
The PEOPLE were sold on this not being a tax and they were still pissed.
Now that its been made obvious that our 'constitutional lawyer in chief' LIED yet again and this time even to his own constituency the PEOPLE are really going crazy about this joke of a law which is just another huge ass tax hike under the guise of heath care...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty Shackleford

3:31 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

As long as the SCOTUS was working on this....and the fact that Roberts looks to have initially been against the 'mandate' it wouldnt suprise me to find out that the man did what he did intentionally to damage Obobo having any chance of reelection.

Me

4:10 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

I do love reading the Chicken Littlesque comments of the left and right wing trolls who such prolific writers. If they spent as much time working on solutions as they do on trying to insult everyone who doesn't think exactly as they do it would be a much better world.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Richard Schulte

4:19 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

"Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." Ronald Reagan

Solutions? Conservatives already have the solutions-no need to work on the solutions a whole bunch. Common sense is the solution to most problems. Conservatism is 99.47 percent common sense.

Richard Schulte

5:09 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Another good article on the Supreme Court ruling:

Rasmussen: "Supreme Court Keeps Health Care Law on Life Support"

"The U.S. Supreme Court's decision that President Obama's health care law is constitutional keeps it alive for now. But it's important to remember that the law has already lost in the court of public opinion. The Supreme Court ruling is a temporary reprieve more than anything else."

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2012/06/29/rasmussen-supreme-court-keeps-health-care-law-on-life-support/?subscriber=1

"It ain't over until the fat lady sings." The fat lady isn't scheduled to sing for another 4 months.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RB

7:27 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Rich, as you quote dead Presidents I would like to give you a Romney quote from an op-Ed about RomneyCare that he wrote for USA today in 2009.
"First, we established incentives for those who were uninsured to buy insurance. Using tax penalties, as we did, or tax credits, as others have proposed, encourages "free riders" to take responsibility for themselves rather than pass their medical costs on to others"

Scott Nelson

9:13 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

No matter the outcome in November, the Neobags won't have a super majority in the Senate after the election. The new health care bill is here to stay. I love it! People just now are learning what is in the health care bill and are liking it. Could you imagine removing the donut hole coverage for seniors the largest voting bloc? Death for the slurping tea baggers. That is the prescription coverage the GOP put in place without a way to pay for it. The Dems added the donut hole coverage. I love The United States.

Reply

Scott Nelson

9:14 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

One more thing, Rich here is always wrong. At least he is consistent.

Reply

Par Golfer

12:03 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

what moron thinks the government can do anything well - let alone be involved in each and every individual's most personal decisions concerning their health? I am shocked that the ACLU isn't up in arms knowing the government which all ready knows your finances will now know your health status. Does anyone believe this won't be tampered with? Less doctors and more government workers - and you think things will get better and cheaper? I guess if you can't be seen by a doctor because they can't charge you if you haven't been there to see them - OH wait a minute - yes they can - they'll tax you anyway! You got to love demonratz

Reply

Leave a comment