patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

What are the Effects of Skokie’s Property-tax freeze and Tax Increment Financing Districts (TIFs)? (They’re not what you may think.)

By Brian Novak

Independent Candidate for Village Trustee

The Village of Skokie often touts its freeze of the Village’s share of the Cook County property-tax levy. This fact is often mentioned in public statements by Village officials – and the Skokie Caucus Party, which has run Village government for the last 40 years, serves up constant reminders – especially in election season. Callers to Village Hall and the Skokie Police Department who are put on hold will often hear a recorded message reminding them that the Village of Skokie has not raised its property-tax levy since 1990.

In its official communications to Skokie residents and business owners, the Village of Skokie has referred to its property-tax freeze in the context of “prudent budgeting and pro-active economic development” and the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts as a “diverse and progressive economic development approach.”

However, it is important to remember that in order for Village government to function, new revenue – especially in times of national financial crisis and recovery – has to come from somewhere.

It is also important to understand the impact of Skokie’s property-tax freeze in context, because it does not stand alone. It is related to two factors: 

  • In recent years the Village has imposed new taxes and raised existing fees.
  • The Village has created TIF districts for the purpose of economic development. However, the creation of TIFs has negatively affected the community by taking money from schools and other taxing bodies, some of which in turn have raised their levies to compensate for the shortfall.

 

In other words, the Village has offset the benefit of the property-tax freeze using methods that burden Skokie residents and businesses with other costs.  In effect, the Village has used the freeze to cloak creative taxing that Skokie residents and business owners end up paying for.

To its credit, the Village of Skokie has maintained its AAA bond rating during a period of federal and state fiscal crisis. As Trustee I will work to ensure that this continues.  However, I will also work to change the misleading perception and costly effects of the property-tax freeze.

Taxes and fees

As a result of the freeze, property-tax revenues contribute increasingly smaller percentages of the total Village of Skokie budget. In FY 2007, the Village budget was approximately $85 million; by FY 2012 it had increased to $109.7 million.

With expenditures increasing and a new Board approved police station to pay for during this same six-year period ('07-'12), the Village of Skokie imposed several new taxes, raised existing fees and created new fines:

  • The new Municipal Utility Tax, which the Village has imposed since FY 2011, constituted 4.98% ($5,650,000) of the total FY2012 Village budget.
  • The Village Board approved an increase to the Telecommunications Tax on January 1, 2008, to pay for the new police station, which accounted for 3.27% ($3,706,418) of the FY 2012 budget.
  • In FY 2009 the Village also added a local fuel tax; at $.03 a gallon, creating additionally revenue of $1,091,240 in FY 2012.
  • New fines have included an automated red-light camera at the intersection of Dempster and McCormick, which generated $20,280 in FY 2012.
  • Existing fees have also been raised. A decade ago, a residential fence permit cost Skokie homeowners $7.50; today they pay $50.

 

In FY 2012 these new and increased taxes and fines total more than $10 million.  As discussed below, the TIF districts had budgeted revenue in FY2012 of almost $15,000,000, which represents an exponential increase in revenue from just under $2,000,000 in FY2007.  To compare, the Village calculated a cost savings from its property tax freeze at $11,941,488 in FY2012, yet it has realized almost $25,000,000 more from these additional/new taxes and TIF revenue.

TIFs

Our property-tax bills include line items for the Skokie library, park district, school districts and the Village of Skokie.  But not included on those bills are the Village TIF districts – which in FY 2012 were budgeted  to generate $14,756,308 in revenue, compared with $1,922,000 in FY 2007.  Skokie currently has 3 active TIF districts: the Downtown TIF (established in 1990); the Downtown Science and Technology TIF (established in 2005); and the West Dempster Street TIF (established in 2010).  The creation of TIF districts enables the Village to collect and use the tax revenue generated by increases in the assessed value of properties in the districts for a fixed amount of time to fund redevelopment in the districts during the life of the TIF.

During the TIF’s lifespan, all affected taxing bodies receive only their share of taxes based on the assessed valuation of the district at the time of the TIF’s inception. Furthermore, while TIF funds can be used only for purposes of economic development, this definition has proven to be extremely ambiguous and may include property acquisition, site preparation, utility connections, building rehabilitation, infrastructure improvements and environmental cleanup. In fact, the Village of Skokie has stretched the definition of TIF-related economic development to support many other initiatives including consulting fees and the proposed skateboard park.

The pool of TIF money diverted to economic development that would otherwise be going to the taxing bodies – the schools, library and park district – burdens all Skokie taxpayers. This is because everyone ends up subsidizing and shouldering more of the increased financial need of those taxing bodies – especially in School District 69, where currently all three Skokie TIF districts are located.  As school budgets increase, the revenue needed to cover the increases must come from those residents/businesses outside the TIF districts.

Generally, the ultimate goal of a TIF is to improve blighted areas with an infusion of revenue that will bring about increased business activity and eventually will offset the loss of property-tax revenues that were frozen and diverted for redevelopment.  However, has the TIF for downtown Skokie, which began in 1990 and expires this year, been successful? Has the area been revived? Is the occupancy rate of the technology park (currently approximately 1,200 employees vs. the projected 3,000 to 5,000 employees) – part of that success? How have District 69 schools been impacted?  Do the TIFs work as planned at all or is our use of TIF districting merely reallocating development to new locations while causing non-TIF areas to grow more slowly as other studies have shown?

Conclusion

These are all questions in need of public scrutiny, led by Village government officials who have the capacity and the courage to address them.

We all know that nobody likes paying taxes, and our constantly rising property-tax bite twice a year is always tough to swallow.  It is important, though, to understand that Skokie’s property-tax freeze has resulted in additional Village-imposed taxes; and its creation of TIF districts has shifted revenue burdens from one taxing body to another.

As an independent running for Skokie Trustee, I pledge that if elected, I will lead a Village review of the effect of the property-tax freeze in relationship to new taxes, increased fees and the net effect that the TIF districts have on other local taxing districts that run the schools, the parks, the library and residents’ pocketbooks.

The people of Skokie deserve leaders who understand the impact of these policies on the overall budget. The leaders elected on April 9th need to have honest conversations with the public they represent about the real impacts and implications of the property-tax freeze. Residents deserve leaders who understand the complexity of budgeting and have the courage and respect to be honest with the community. These are prerequisites for leading our community successfully – now and in the years to come. 

In four years as an elected member of the District 73.5 School Board, I have gained experience and skills related to analyzing and managing budgetary resources that come from tax dollars. As Trustee, I will put this and other experience and skills to work for the people of Skokie.

I am asking for your support so that I can address these issues as your Village Trustee. Vote Brian Novak, independent candidate for Village Trustee, on Election Day, April 9. To learn more about my candidacy, please visit my website at www.novakforskokie.com

Please join me at the the Panera on Golf/Skokie Blvd Wednesday, March 13th at 10:30am to discuss this and other issues facing our community.

shp

8:25 am on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Brian's article is very transparent, and how refreshing. This is such an important issue for the Village of Skokie overall, but one that has not been explained so others can understand. The only thing we hear about is that property taxes have been frozen for all these years. Thanks for a clear and concise article. ALL OF SKOKIE WILL BENEFIT BY VOTING FOR ALL INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES! EARLY VOTING STARTS MARCH 25TH AT VILLAGE HALL FOR THE APRIL 9TH ELECTION. Please get out and vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James S. Nasby

12:22 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

I strongly Agree. I'm voting for both Brian Novak and for Lisa Lipin. Time for some fresh thinking to our old problems, and our growing problems. Namely crime and the unfriendly business climate in our Village. Do you remember when Skokie was a somewhat magical place and not merely a branch or copy of the City to the south of us?

shp

8:26 am on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Brian - Have an evening or weekend forum so others can attend.

Reply

Susie Cohen

8:35 am on Thursday, March 7, 2013

It seems to me the only people who write actual articles for Patch are the politicians who are trying to get their message out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorel

9:32 am on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Or point out what a bad place Skokie is to live...

Comment_arrow

Ari goldstein

10:00 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Susie and Lorel- Perhaps you should write some articles articulating your viewpoint, rather than complaining about how others are doing it? Oh yes, that would require you to do something positive rather than destructive...

Patch_comments_icon

George Slefo

12:06 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Just a heads up - you can read about other politicians and their message here: http://skokie.patch.com/topics/skokies-2013-trustee-candidates

Best,

George

Reply

Julia Clarke

3:16 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

So, Will the downtown TIFs be renewed, Brian?

Reply

James S. Nasby

9:02 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

Brian --

Excellent, excellent analysis. I disagree with the TIF scheme since, as you indicated, it robs our schools of funds that THEY need. TIF were originally designed for depressed and slum neighborhoods where re-hab. would significantly increase the value of the area, and thus assessed value, and thus, potentially increase revenue. But, the actual tax bill for any taxing body is a function of their budget, not solely on assessed valuation. Hence, who profits from TIF's other than the contractors doing the work? And I often wonder who, exactly, puts these schemes together in the first place.

Keep up the good work!! You have my vote for sure.

Best regards . . .

Reply

Susan Donian

11:57 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

This is a great example of how much information we are unaware of....what is a TIF District? Why? What happened on Oakton Street to Desiree? If that was a TIF District since 1990, and it's expiring, and not renewable, then, what a sad failure. If TIF is what helped Kaufman's maybe it's a good thing? I don't understand TIF Districts and I want to. Brian Novak is the ONLY potential VILLAGE OFFICIAL that has even addressed this very important issue! Brian Novak is trying to inform us! Brian Novak will make a great Trustee for Skokie! I hope he gets elected! Vote for Brian Novak for Skokie!

Reply

Michael Patrick

4:43 pm on Thursday, March 14, 2013

Interesting sidebar: when it was first initiated, the municipal utility tax (MUT) was sold as a means to fund additional pension needs, in particular Public Safety pensions. This was to be extra money, beyond the amount generated by property taxes. At the start, this is what was done. Funding for police and fire pensions through the use of property tax money remained at previous levels, while municipal utility tax monies provided the "extra" needed because of investment losses by the funds. Now however, the MUT funds the pensions In their entirety, largely at the pre-MUT level. No property tax monies went to police or fire pensions in Fiscal Year 2012 at all. (See the budgets on-line at www. Skokie.org. Select Department, Finance, budgets, then look for funds allocation. You'll see what paid for what in that fiscal year. You'll need to look at several years separately to see the funding change to which I'm referring.

Reply

Michael Patrick

11:13 pm on Thursday, March 14, 2013

I took my own advice and looked at the budget. Please forgive me but virtually everything I stated above is incorrect. Somehow in previous readings of the budget I got some things wrong. I spotted my error when I went back for a re-read. While it was an honest mistake it was misleading regarding Village fiscal practices. I retract my earlier comments.

Reply

Leave a comment